In a recent friendly debate, I took the position that deacons cannot administer the sacrament of anointing of the sick. I eventually quoted canon 1003 of the Code of Canon Law, which says, "Every priest, and only a priest, validly administers the anointing of the sick." My adversary, however, replied that the canon can't mean what it says because if it were to be taken literally, then a bishop wouldn't be able to administer the sacrament either. We both knew that must be wrong. What's the story?