<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1906385056278061&ev=PageView&noscript=1" />


Was the Council of Trent inconsistent in its treatment of the deuterocanonical books?


I read in a Protestant book recently that the Council of Trent was inconsistent because it accepted some “apocryphal” books—such as 1 and 2 Maccabees—as canonical but did not accept others, such as 1 and 2 Esdras. How do you respond?


Enjoying this content?  Please support our mission!Donate
By continuing to use this site you agree to our Terms and that you have read our Privacy Policy.