Skip to main contentAccessibility feedback

Dear catholic.com visitors: This website from Catholic Answers, with all its many resources, is the world's largest source of explanations for Catholic beliefs and practices. A fully independent, lay-run, 501(c)(3) ministry that receives no funding from the institutional Church, we rely entirely on the generosity of everyday people like you to keep this website going with trustworthy , fresh, and relevant content. If everyone visiting this month gave just $1, catholic.com would be fully funded for an entire year. Do you find catholic.com helpful? Please make a gift today. SPECIAL PROMOTION FOR NEW MONTHLY DONATIONS! Thank you and God bless.

Dear catholic.com visitors: This website from Catholic Answers, with all its many resources, is the world's largest source of explanations for Catholic beliefs and practices. A fully independent, lay-run, 501(c)(3) ministry that receives no funding from the institutional Church, we rely entirely on the generosity of everyday people like you to keep this website going with trustworthy , fresh, and relevant content. If everyone visiting this month gave just $1, catholic.com would be fully funded for an entire year. Do you find catholic.com helpful? Please make a gift today. SPECIAL PROMOTION FOR NEW MONTHLY DONATIONS! Thank you and God bless.

Background Image

Sexual Preference Is Not Identity

Question:

How should a Catholic respond to the argument that homosexuality is an identity and is a part of a person?

Answer:

The first response is that the argument’s underlying assumption—namely, that a person’s identity is dependent on his or her sexual attraction—leads to absurdities. For example, would we use the same line of reasoning for a man who by no choice of his own is sexually attracted to children? Should we say his attraction is a part of who he is and thus his identity? Of course not!

We could use this same line of reasoning for any other sexual attraction that a person happens to have independent of their choice.

A second response is that the argument entails a false view of the human being, which is that our sexed bodies are not essential to our identity.

Notice the argument breaks the ties between sexual orientation and the natural correlation between the masculine and the feminine. The relation between one’s sexual orientation and the sexual polarity inscribed in human bodies becomes arbitrary and accidental (non-essential).

In light of this separation, if sexual “orientation” defines a person’s identity, then the sexual polarity of male and female is reduced to a sub-personal and material significance. Our sexed bodies become merely a material circumstance for living out our sexual orientation.

But this is not true. The sexual polarity that exists in the human body is essential to our identity. A defense of this claim goes beyond the scope of this brief answer, but suffice to say that when you read this answer, which involves your bodily powers of sensation, you are reading it. It’s not as if your body sees the words and your person understands it. No, you both see and understand.

Sexual attraction or “orientation” can’t determine our identity, because it presupposes our natural sexual polarity. Sexual attraction arises out of the natural sexual polarity inscribed in the body.

Nature intends first the biological correlation between male and female, which is constitutive of our identity, and then from that intends sexual attraction to correspond to such sexual polarity. So when a person is sexually attracted to a person of the same sex, for whatever reason, it is a disordered attraction.

Did you like this content? Please help keep us ad-free
Enjoying this content?  Please support our mission!Donatewww.catholic.com/support-us