Skip to main contentAccessibility feedback

Does the use of the present tense in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis suggest that the Church could ordain women in the future?


My friend says that because the key phrase in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis—"the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women"—was written in the present tense it means the Church was not authorized to ordain women as of 1994 but that it could be authorized to do so later on. What do you say?


Let’s apply your friend’s logic elsewhere. If all statements made by the Church in the present tense are, ipso facto, mutable, this also means that the Church can authorize divorce! After all, the priest says, “I now pronounce you man and wife” (present tense). So who says the happy couple is still married five minutes from now? “This is my body” is spoken in the present tense. So there’s no guarantee it stays Christ’s body after the act of consecration. Going further, the whole Creed is up for grabs by your friend’s lights. After all, “we believe [present tense] in one God . . .” Who says the Church will believe that next year?

Indeed, if we accept your friend’s reasoning, atheism is now potentially compatible with Catholic belief! After all, God is I AM (present tense). Who knows if he will still exist five minutes from now?

Your friend’s is perhaps the weakest argument against the authority of Ordinatio Sacerdotalis I have ever encountered.

Did you like this content? Please help keep us ad-free
Enjoying this content?  Please support our mission!