Johann Sebastian von Drey
Professor of theology at the University of Tubingen, b. Oct. 16, 1777, d. Feb. 19, 1853
Drey, JOHANN SEBASTIAN VON, professor of theology at the University of Tubingen, b. October 16, 1777, at Killingen, in the parish of Rohlingen, in the then ecclesiastical principality of Ellwangen; d. February 19, 1853. The parish priest of Rohlingen, an ex-Jesuit, noting the boy’s talents, instructed him in the elements of Latin, and persuaded his parents to send him, in 1787, in spite of their extreme poverty, to the gymnasium of Ellwangen. There he lived partly on the charity of the townspeople and partly by tutoring, especially in Latin, mathematics, and physics. He studied theology, 1797-1799, at Augsburg; after 1799 he lived in the diocesan seminary at Pfaffenhausen and was ordained in the summer of 1801. During his five years as assistant in his native place, Drey studied the then paramount philosophy of Kant, Fichte, and Schelling, and the philosophical erudition which he acquired in this study appears clearly in his scientific works. His position, from 1806, as professor of philosophy of religion, mathematics, and physics in the Catholic academy of Rottweil, formed a good preparation for his subsequent academical career. When in 1812 King Frederick I of Würtemberg founded the University of Ellwangen as a Catholic national university for his recently acquired Catholic territory, Drey was called to lecture there on dogmatics, history of dogma, apologetics, and introduction to theology. There he published two Latin dissertations: “Observata quaedam ad illustrandam Justini M. de regno millenario sententiam” (1814), and “Dissertatio historico-the-ologica originem et vicissitudinem exomologeseos in ecclesia catholicae ex documentis ecclesiasticis illustrans” (1815), the latter of which was denounced to Rome, but without serious consequences for its author, at least for the time being.
When King William I (1817) incorporated the University of Ellwangen with the old national University of Tübingen as its Catholic faculty of theology, Drey with his colleagues, Gratz and Herbst, joined the staff of the new school and founded (1819), together with them and his new colleague, Hirscher, the “Theologische Quartal-schrift” of Tübingen, still flourishing; he took a prominent part in its publication and wrote for it a number of essays and reviews. In the same year he published: “Kurze Einleitung in das Studium der Theologie mit Rücksicht auf den wissenschaftlichen Standpunkt and das katholische System”. An effort to make Drey first bishop of the newly founded Diocese of Rottenburg failed, among other reasons because of the distrust with which he was regarded in Rome owing to his above-named work on confession. Somewhat as a recompense the first position at the cathedral was reserved for him, which, however, he never filled. In 1832 appeared his “Neue Untersuchungen über die Konstitutionen and Kanones der Apostel”, a work of such thoroughness that only recent investigations, especially those of von Funk, have gone beyond it. After convalescing from a severe illness, he was relieved from his office as teacher of dogmatic theology (1838). Just then his principal work, in three volumes, appeared: “Die Apologetik als wissensehaftliehe Naehweisung der Göttliehkeit des Christentums in seiner Erscheinung” (1838-1847). Still comparatively robust, though well advanced in years, Drey was pensioned in 1846, almost against his will; he continued, however, to write for Wetzer and Welte’s “Kirchenlexikon” and for the “Theologische Quartalschrift” of Tübingen. With Mohler, Drey was the founder of the so-called Catholic School of Tubingen. Like Mohler, Hefele, and von Funk, he was a truly critical historian. But Drey also gave to the systematic theology of this school its peculiar stamp, equi-distinct from Traditionalism and Rationalism, recognizing on the one hand the objective facts in the history of Revelation and the tradition from generation to generation, maintaining on the other the rights of our natural reason and of philosophical speculation, with all due loyalty to dogma. Kuhn and Schanz faithfully followed in the path marked out by Drey.
JOHANN BAPTIST SIGMULLER