Skip to main contentAccessibility feedback

Animals in the Bible

Click to enlarge

Animals in the Bible. —The Bible makes no pretensions to science; we must not therefore expect to meet in its pages with any kind of elaborate classification, whether zoological or otherwise. The sacred books, on the other hand, were composed by, and for a people almost exclusively given to husbandry and pastoral life, hence in constant communication with nature. To such a people references to the animal world, animal customs, etc., are quite natural, and the more animals abounded in the country, the more frequent and varied these allusions may be expected to be. In point of fact, the names of a large number of animals—over a hundred and twenty species—occur in the Scriptures. A closer examination of the way in which references to animals are introduced, the frequency of allusions to certain species, and the date of the documents in which they are found, may give a fair idea of the conditions of the country at the different stages of its history. The species, for instance, called in Hebrew re’em, very probably the aurochs, or wild ox, totally disappeared about the time of the Babylonian captivity; the wild ass, the lion, and a few others long ago became extinct in Palestine; other species are now so scarce that they could hardly afford a familiar subject for illustration. The variety of animals spoken of in the Bible is remarkable; the ostrich, for instance, a denizen of the torrid regions, and the camel, of the waterless districts around Palestine, are mentioned side by side with the roebuck and deer of the woody summits of Lebanon. This variety, greater probably in Palestine than in any other country in the same latitude, should be attributed to the great extremes of elevation and temperature in this small country. Furthermore, that the Palestinian fauna is not now as rich as it used to be during the Biblical times, must not be wondered at; the land, now bare, was then well wooded, especially on the hills east of the Jordan; hence the changes. Although no regular classification is to be sought for in the Bible, it is easy to see, however, that the animal creation is there practically divided into four classes, according to the four different modes of locomotion; among the animals, some walk, others fly, many are essentially swimmers, several crawl on the ground. This classification, more empiric than logical, would not by any means satisfy a modern scientist; it must be known, however, if we wish fairly to understand the language of the Scriptures on the matters connected therewith. The first class, the behemoth, or beasts, in the Biblical parlance, includes all quadrupeds living on the earth, with the exception of the amphibia and such small animals as moles, mice, and the like. Beasts are divided into cattle, or domesticated (behemoth in the strict sense), and beasts of the field, i.e. wild animals. The fowls, which constitute the second class, include not only the birds, but also “all things that fly”, even if they “go upon four feet”, as the different kinds of locusts. Of the many “living beings that swim in the water” no particular species is mentioned; the “great whales” are set apart in that class, while the rest are divided according as they have, or have not, fins and scales (Lev., xi, 9, 10). The reptiles, or “creeping things”, form the fourth class. References to this class are relatively few; however, it should be noticed that the “creeping things” include not only the reptiles properly so called, but also all shortlegged animals or insects which seem to crawl rather than to walk, such as moles, lizards, etc. From a religious viewpoint, all these animals are divided into two classes, clean and unclean, according as they can, or cannot, be eaten. We shall presently give, in alphabetical order, the list of the animals whose names occur in the Bible; whenever required for the identification, the Hebrew name will be indicated, as well as the specific term used by naturalists. This list will include even such names as griffon, lamia, siren or unicorn, which, though generally applied to fabulous beings, have nevertheless, on account of some misunderstandings or educational prejudices of the Greek and Latin translators, crept into the versions, and have been applied to real animals. (In the following list D.V. stands for Douay Version, A.V. and R.V. for Authorized and Revised Version respectively.)

ADDAX.—A kind of antelope (antilope addax) with twisted horns; it very probably corresponds to the dishon of the Hebrews and the pygarg of the diverse translations (Deut., xiv, 5). ADDER.—A poisonous snake of the genus Vipera. The word, unused in the D.V., stands in the A.V. for four different Hebrew names of serpents. ANT. (Prov., vi, 6; xxx, 25).—Over twelve species of ants exist in Palestine; among them the ants of the genus Atta are particularly common, especially the atta barbara, of dark color, and the atta structor, a brown species. These, with the pheidole megacephala, are, unlike the ants of northern countries, accustomed to lay up stores of corn for winter use. Hence the allusions of the wise man in the two abovementioned passages of Proverbs. ANTELOPE.—The word, first applied as a qualification to the gazelle, on account of the lustre and soft expression of its eye, has become the name of a genus of ruminant quadrupeds intermediate between the deer and the goat. Four species are mentioned in the Bible: (I) the dishon (D.V. pygarg; Deut., xiv, 5), commonly identified with the antilope addax; (2) the cebhi (Deut., xii, 15, etc.; D.V. roe) or gazelle, antilope dorcas; (3) the the’6 (Deut., xiv, 5; D.V. wild goat; Is., li, 20, D.V. wild ox), which seems to be the bubale (antilope bubalis); and (4) the ydhm?2r (Deut., xiv, 5), the name of which is given by the Arabs to the roebuck of Northern Syria and to the oryx (the white antelope, antilope oryx) of the desert. APE.—Nowhere in the Bible is the ape supposed to be indigenous to Palestine. Apes are mentioned with gold, silver, ivory, and peacocks among the precious things imported by Solomon from Tharsis (III K., x, 22; II Par., ix. 21). Asp.—This word, which occurs ten times in D.V., stands for four Hebrew names: (I) Pethen [Deut., xxxii, 33; Job, xx, 14, 16; Ps., lvii (Hebr., lviii), 5; Is., xi, 8]. From several allusions both to its deadly venom (Deut., xxxii, 33), and to its use by serpent-charmers [Ps., lvii (Hebr., hiii), 5, 6], it appears that the cobra (naja aspis) is most probably signified. Safely to step upon its body, or even linger by the hole where it coils itself, is manifestly a sign of God‘s particular protection [Ps., xc (Hebr., xci), 13; Is., xi, 8]. Sophar, one of Job‘s friends, speaks of the wicked as sucking the venom of pethen, in punishment whereof the food he takes shall be turned within him into the gall of this poisonous reptile (Job, xx, 16, 14). (2) `Akhshubh, mentioned only once in the Hebrew Bible, namely Ps., cxl (Vulg., exxxix), 4, but manifestly alluded to in Ps., xiii, 3, and Rom., iii, 13, seems to have been one of the most highly poisonous kinds of viper, perhaps the toxicoa, also called echis arenicola or scytale of the Pyramids, very common in Syria and North Africa. (3) Shandl is also found only once to signify a snake, Ps., xci (Vulg., xc), 13; but what particular kind of snake we are unable to determine. The word shandl might possibly, owing to some copyist’s mistake, have crept into the place of another name now impossible to restore. (4) cphoni (Is., lix, 5), “the hisser”, generally rendered by basilisk in D.V. and in ancient translations, the latter sometimes calling it regulus. This snake was deemed so deadly that, according to the common saying, its hissing alone, even its look, was fatal. It was probably a small viper, perhaps a cerastes, possibly the daboia zanthina, according to Cheyne. Ass.—The ass has always enjoyed a marked favor above all other beasts of burden in Palestine. This is evidenced by two very simple remarks. While, on the one hand, mention of this animal occurs over a hundred and thirty times in Holy Writ; on the other hand, the Hebrew vocabulary possesses, to designate the ass, according to its color, sex, age, etc., a supply of words in striking contrast with the ordinary penury of the sacred language. Of these various names the most common is hamor, “reddish”, the hair of the Eastern ass being generally of that color. White asses, more rare, were also more appreciated and reserved for the use of the nobles (Judges, v, 10). The custom was introduced very early, as it seems, and still prevails, to paint the most shapely and valuable donkeys in stripes of different colors. In the East the ass is much larger and finer than in other countries, and in several places the pedigrees of the best breeds are carefully preserved. Asses have always been an important item in the resources of the Eastern peoples, and we are repeatedly told in the Bible about the herds of these animals owned by the patriarchs (Gen., xii, 16; xxx, 43; xxxvi, 24, etc.), and wealthy Israelites (I K., ix, 3; I Par., xxvii, 30, etc.). Hence the several regulations brought forth by Israel’s lawgiver on this subject: the neighbor’s ass should not be coveted (Exod., xx, 17); moreover, should the neighbor’s stray ass be found, it should be taken care of, and its owner assisted in tending this part of his herd (Deut., xxii, 3, 4). The ass serves in the East for many purposes. Its even gait and surefootedness, so well suited to the rough paths of the Holy Land, made it at all times the most popular of all the animals for riding in those hilly regions (Gen., xxii, 3; Luke, xix, 30). Neither was it ridden only by the common people, but also by persons of the highest rank (Judges, v, 10; x, 4; II K., xvii, 23; xix, 26, etc.). No wonder therefore that Our Lord about to come triumphantly to Jerusalem, commanded His disciples to bring Him an ass and her colt; no lesson of humility, as is sometimes asserted, but the affirmation of the peaceful character of His kingdom should be sought there. Although the Scripture speaks of “saddling” the ass, usually no saddle was used by the rider; a cloth spread upon the back of the ass and fastened by a strap was all the equipment. Upon this cloth the rider sat, a servant usually walking alongside. Should a family journey, the women and children would ride the asses, attended by the father (Exod., iv, 20). This mode of travelling has been popularized by Christian painters, who copied the eastern customs in their representations of the Holy Family‘s flight to Egypt. Scores of passages in the Bible allude to asses carrying burdens; the Gospels, at least in the Greek text, speak of millstones run by asses (Matt., xviii, 6; Mark, ix, 41; Luke, xvii, 2); Josephus and the Egyptian monuments teach us that this animal was used for threshing wheat; finally, we repeatedly read in the O. T. of asses hitched to a plough (Dent., xxii, 10; Is., xxx, 24, etc.), and in reference to this custom, the Law forbade ploughing with an ox and an ass together (Deut., xxii, 10). From Is., xxi, 7, confirmed by the statements of Greek writers, we learn that part of the cavalry force in the Persian army rode donkeys; we should perhaps understand from IV K., vii, 7, that the Syrian armies followed the same practice; but no such custom seems to have ever prevailed among the Hebrews. With them the ass was essentially for peaceful use, the emblem of peace, as the horse was the symbol of war. The flesh of the ass was unclean and forbidden by the Law. In some particular circumstances, however, no law could prevail over necessity, and we read that during Joram’s reign, when Benadad besieged Samaria, the famine was so extreme in this city, that the head of an ass was sold for fourscore pieces of silver (IV K., vi, 25). Ass‘s Colt: This is more specially the symbol of peace and meek obedience (John, xii, 15). Ass, WILD, corresponds in the O. T. to two words, ??Hebr. pere’ and `arOdh. Whether these two names refer to different species, or are, the one, the genuine Hebrew name, the other, the Aramaic equivalent for the same animal, is uncertain. Both signify one of the wildest and most untamable animals. The wild ass is larger and more shapely than the domestic one, and outruns the fleetest horse. Its untamableness joined to its nimbleness made it a fit symbol for the wild and plunder-loving Ismael (Gen., xvi, 12). The wild ass, extinct in western Asia, still exists in central Asia and the deserts of Africa. ATTACUS (Lev., xi, 22).—Instead of this Latin word, the A.V. reads bald-locust. According to the tradition enshrined in the Talmud, the common truxalis, a locust with a very long smooth head is probably signified. AUROCHS, or wild ox (urus, bos primigenius), is undoubtedly the rimu of the Assyrian inscriptions, and consequently corresponds to the re’em or rem of the Hebrews. The latter word is translated sometimes in our D.V. by rhinoceros (Num., xxiii, 22; xxiv, 8; Deut., xxxiii, 17; Job, xxxix, 9, 10), sometimes by unicorn (Ps., xxi, 22; xxviii, 6; xci, 11; Is., xxxiv, 7). That the re’em’, far from being unicorn, was a two-horned animal, is suggested by Ps., xxi, 22, and forcibly evidenced by Deut., xxxiii, 17, where its horns represent the two tribes of Ephraim and Manasses; that, moreover, it was akin to the domestic ox is shown from such parallelisms as we find in Ps., xxviii, 6, where we read, according to the critical editions of the Hebrew text: “The voice of Yahweh makes Lebanon skip like a bullock, and Sirion like a young re’em”; or Is., xxxiv, 7: “And the re’em shall go down with them, and the bulls with the mighty”; and still more convincingly by such implicit descriptions as that of Job, xxxix, 9, 10: “Shall the rem be willing to serve thee, or will he stay at thy crib? Canst thou bind the rem with thy thong to plough, or will he break the clods of the valleys after thee?” These references will be very clear, the last especially, once we admit the re’em is an almost untamable wild ox, which one would try in vain to submit to the same work as its domestic kin. Hence there is very little doubt that in all the abovementioned places the word aurochs should be substituted for rhinoceros and unicorn. The aurochs is for the sacred poets a familiar emblem of untamed strength and ferocity. It no longer exists in western Asia.

BABOON, a kind of dog-faced, long-haired monkey, dwelling among ruins (gen. Cynocephalus); it was an object of worship for the Egyptians. Some deem it to be the “hairy one” spoken of in Is., xiii, 21 and xxxiv, 14, but it is very doubtful whether it ever existed west of the Euphrates. BADGER.—No mention of the badger (meles taxus) is found in the D.V., whereas the A.V. regularly gives it as the English equivalent for tehash. The skin of the tahash is repeatedly spoken of as used for the outer cover of the tabernacle and the several pieces of its furniture. The old translations, and the D.V. after them, understood the word tahash to mean a color (violet; Ex., xxv, 5; xxvi, 14; xxxv, 7, 23; xxxvi, 19; Num., iv, 10, 25; Ezech., xvi, 10); but this is a misrepresentation; so also is the rendering of the A.V.; for though the badger is common in Palestine, yet the Hebrew name most probably indicates the dugong (halicore hemprichii or halicore tabernaculi), a very large species of the seal family living in the Red Sea, the skin of which is used to the present day for such purposes as those alluded to in the Bible. BASILISK occurs in the D.V. as an equivalent for several Hebrew names of snakes: (I) Pethen (Ps. xc, 13), the cobra; had the Latin and English translators been more consistent they would have rendered this Hebrew word here, as in the other places, by asp; (2) Cepha’ and Ciphe ‘oni (Prow., xxiii, 32; Is., xi, 8; xiv, 29; Jer., viii, ’17; (3) ‘ephe’eh (Is., lix, 5), a kind of viper impossible to determine, or perhaps the echis arenicola; (4) flying saraph (Is., xiv, 29; xxx, 6), a winged serpent (?), possibly also a reptile like the draco fimbriatus, which, having long ribs covered with a fringe-like skin, is able to glide through the air for short distances. BAT.—The bat, fourteen species of which still exist in Palestine is reckoned among unclean “winged things” (Lev., xi, 19; Deut., xiv, 18). Its abode is generally in dark and desolate places such as ruins and caverns. BEAR.—The bear spoken of in the Bible is the ursus syriacus, scarcely different from the brown bear of Europe. Since the destruction of the forests, it is now rarely seen south of Lebanon and Hermon, where it is common. Not unfrequently met in the Holy Land during the O. T. times, it was much dreaded on account of its ferocious and destructive instincts; to dare it was accordingly a mark of uncommon courage (I K., xvii, 34-36). Its terror-striking roars and its fierceness, especially when robbed of its cubs, are repeatedly alluded to. BEAST, WILD.—The expression occurs twice in the D.V., but much oftener in the A.V., and R.V., where it is in several places a substitute for the awkward “beast of the field”, the Hebrew name of wild animals at large. The first time we read of “wild beasts” in the D.V., it fairly stands for the Hebrew word ziz [Ps. lxxix (Hebr., lxxx), 14], albeit the “singular wild beast” is a clumsy translation. The same Hebrew word in Ps. xlix, 11, at least for consistency’s sake, should have been rendered in the same manner; “the beauty of the field” must consequently be corrected into “wild beast”. In Is., xiii, 21, “wild beasts” is an equivalent for the Hebr. Ciyyim, i.e. denizens of the desert. This word in different places has been translated in diverse manners: demons (Is., xxxiv, 14), dragons (Ps. Ixxii, 14; Jer., 1, 39); it possibly refers to the hyena. BEE.—Palestine, according to Scripture, is a land flowing with honey (Ex., iii, 8). Its dry climate, its rich abundance, and variety of aromatic flowers, and its limestone rocks render it particularly adapted for bees. No wonder then that honey bees, both wild and hived, abound there. All the different species known by the names of bombus, nomia, andrena, osmia, megachile, anthophora, are widely spreadthroughout the country. The hived honey bee of Palestine, apis fasciata, belongs to a variety slightly different from ours, characterized by yellow stripes on the abdomen. Wild bees are said to live not only in rocks [Ps. lxxx (Hebr., lxxxi), 17], but in hollow trees (I K., xiv, 25), even in dried carcasses (Judges, xiv, 8). Syrian and Egyptian hives are made of a mash of clay and straw for coolness. In O. T. times, honey was an article of export (Gen., xliii, 11; Ezech., xxvii, 17). Bees are spoken of in Holy Writ as a term of comparison for a numerous army relentlessly harassing their enemies. Deborah, the Hebrew name for bee, was a favorite name for women. BEETLE, given by A.V. (Lev., xi, 22) as an equivalent for Hebrew, krbeh, does not meet the requirements of the context: “Hath the legs behind longer wherewith it hoppeth upon the earth”, any more than the bruchus of D.V., some species of locust, the locusta migratoria being very likely intended. BEHEMOTH, is generally translated by “great beasts”; in its wider signification it includes all mammals living on earth, but in the stricter sense is applied to domesticated quadrupeds at large. However in Job, xl, 10, where it is left untranslated and considered as a proper name, it indicates a particular animal. The description of this animal has long puzzled the commentators. Many of them now admit that it represents the hippopotamus, so well known to the ancient Egyptians; it might possibly correspond as well to the rhinoceros. BIRD.—No other classification of birds than into clean and unclean is given. The Jews, before the captivity, had no domestic fowls except pigeons. Although many birds are mentioned, there occur few allusions to their habits. Their instinct of migration, the snaring or netting them, and the caging of song birds are referred to. BIRD, DYED.—SO does the English version, Jer., xii, 9, wrongly interpret the Hebrew kyit, which means beast of prey, sometimes also bird of prey. BIRD, SINGING.—This singing bird of Soph., ii, 14, according to the D.V., owes its origin to a mistranslation of the original, which most probably should be read: “And their voice shall sing at the window”; unless by a mistake of some scribe, the word qol, voice, has been substituted for the name of some particular bird. BIRD, SPECKLED, Hebrew cabhuac` (Jer., xii, 9). A much discussed translation. The interpretation of the English versions, however meaningless it may seem to some, is supported by the Targum, the Syriac, and St. Jerome. In spite of these authorities many modern scholars prefer to use the word hyena, given by the Septuagint and confirmed by Ecclesiasticus, xiii, 22 as well as by the Arabic (dkbuh) and rabbinical Hebrew (cebhOa`), names of the hyena. BISON, according to several authors, the re’em of the Bible. It belongs to the same genus as the aurochs, but being indigenous to America (whence its name, bos americanus), and specifically different from the aurochs, cannot possibly have been known by the Hebrews. BITTERN (bothaurus vulgaris), a shy, solitary, wading bird related to the heron and inhabiting the recesses of swamps, where its startling, booming cry at night gives a frightening impression of desolation. In the D.V., bittern stands for Hebr. ga’ath (Lev., xi, 18; Is., xxxiv, 11; Soph., ii, 14), although by some inconsistency the same Hebrew word is rendered Deut., xiv, 17, by cormorant, and Ps. ci (Hebr., cii), 7, by pelican. The pelican meets all the requirements of all the passages where ga’ath is mentioned, and would perhaps be a better translation than bittern. BLAST certainly, designates, Deut., xxviii, 42, a voracious insect; the Hebrew celachl, “chirping”, suggests that the cricket was possibly meant and might be substituted for blast. In Ps. lxxvii (Hebr., lxxviii), 46, blast stands for hasil, “the destroyer”, perhaps the locust in its caterpillar state, in which it is most destructive. BOAR, WILD.—The only allusion to this animal is found Ps. lxxix (Hebr., lxxx), 14; however, the wild boar was undoubtedly always, as it is now, common in Palestine, having its lair in the woods, and most destructive to vineyards. Brucaus.—Though it occurs once (Lev., xi, 22) as an equivalent for Hebrew, ‘drbeh (probably the locusta migratoria), the word bruchus is the regular interpretation for yeleq, “licker”. The Biblical bruchus may be fairly identified with the beetle, or some insect akin to it. Anyway the yeleq of Jer., li, 14, 27, should have been rendered in the same manner as everywhere else. BUBALE, antilope bubalis, or alcephalus bubalis, which should not be confounded with the bubale, bos bubalus, is probably signified by the Hebrew, the’a, interpreted by the Douay translators, wild goat, in Deut., xiv, 5, and wild ox, Is., li, 20. It still exists in Palestine, but was formerly much more common than now. BUFFALO (bos bubalus).—So does the D.V. translate the Hebrew, yahmur, III K., iv, 23 (Hebr., I K., v, 3). Being a denizen of marshy and swampy lands, the buffalo must have been scarcely known by the Hebrews. Moreover, its coarse, unpleasant smelling flesh seems to exclude the identification with the animal referred to in the above mentioned passage, where we should probably read roebuck. BUFFLE.—Another word for buffalo, D.V., Deut., xiv, 5. According to good authorities, the oryx, or white antelope, might be here intended, the Hebrew word yahmur possibly meaning, as its Arabic equivalent does, both the roebuck and the oryx. BULL.—A symbol of fierce and relentless adversaries [Ps. xxi (Hebr., xxii), 13]. BULLOCK.—The bullock, as yet unaccustomed to the yoke, is an image of Israel’s insubordinate mind before he was subdued by the captivity (Jer., xxxi, 18). BUZZARD (Hebr., ra’ah).—Probably the ringtail of D.V. and the glede of A.V. (Deut., xiv, 13); possibly, through a scribe’s error, might be identified with the kite, da’ah, of Lev., xi, 14. The buzzard, three species of which exist in Palestine, has always been common there.

CALF, one of the most popular representations of the deity among the Chanaanites. The calf is, in Biblical poetry, a figure for vexing and pitiless foes [Ps., xxi (Hebr., xxii), 13]. The fatted calf was a necessary feature, so to say, of a feast dinner. CAMEL, a prominent domestic animal of the East without the existence of which life in the Arabian deserts would be impossible. It was perhaps the first beast of burden applied to the service of man; anyway it is mentioned as such in the Biblical records as early as the time of Abraham. It constituted a great element in the riches of the early patriarchs. There are two species of camel: the one-humped camel (camelus dromedarius), and the two-humped camel (camelus bactrianus). The camel is used for riding as well as for carrying loads; its furniture is a large frame placed on the humps, to which cradles or packs are attached. In this manner was all the merchandise of Assyria and Egypt transported. But the camel is appreciated for other reasons: it may be hitched to a wagon or to a plough, and in fact is not unfrequently yoked together with the ass or the ox; the female supplies abundantly her master with a good milk; camel’s hair is woven into a rough cloth wherewith tents and cloaks are made; finally its flesh, albeit coarse and dry, may be eaten. With the Jews, however, the camel was reckoned among the unclean animals. CAMELOPARDALUS, occurs only once in the D.V. (Deut., xiv, 5), as a translation of zemer. The word, a mere transcription of the Latin and the Greek, is a combination of the names of the camel and the leopard, and indicates the giraffe,. But this translation, as well as that of the A.V. (chamois), is doubtless erroneous; neither the giraffe nor the chamois ever lived in Palestine.

The wild sheep, or mouflon, which still lingers in Cyprus and Arabia Petrala, is very likely intended CANKERWORM, the locust in its larva state, in which it is most voracious. So does A.V. render the Hebrew, gazam; the word palmerworm, given by the D.V. seems better. CAT.—Mention of this animal occurs only once in the Bible, namely Bar., vi, 21. The original text of Baruch being lost, we possess no indication as to what the Hebrew name of the cat may have been. Possibly there was not any; for although the cat was very familiar to the Egyptians, it seems to have been altogether unknown to the Jews, as well as to the Assyrians and Babylonians, even to the Greeks and Romans before the conquest of Egypt. These and other reasons have led some commentators to believe that the word cat, in the above cited place of Baruch, might not unlikely stand for another name now impossible to restore. CATTLE.—Very early in the history of mankind, animals were tamed and domesticated, to be used in agriculture, for milk, for their flesh, and especially for sacrifices. Many words in Hebrew expressed the different ages and sexes of cattle. West of the Jordan the cattle were generally stall-fed; in the plain and hills south and east they roamed in a half-wild state; such were the most famous “bulls of Basan”. CERASTES (Hebr., shephiphon) should be substituted in D.V. for the colorless “serpent”, Gen., xlix, 17. The identification of the shephiphon with the deadly horned cerastes (cerastes hasselquistii or vipera cerastes) is evidenced by the Arabic name of the latter (shuffon), and its customs in perfect agreement with the indications of the Bible. The cerastes, one of the most venomous of snakes, is in the habit of coiling itself in little depressions such as camels’ footmarks, and suddenly darting on any passing animal. CHAMELEON (Hebr., koah).—Mentioned Lev., xi, 30, with the mole (Hebr., tinshemeth). In spite of the authority of the ancient translations, it is now generally admitted that the tinshemeth is the chameleon, very common in Palestine; whereas the koah is a kind of large lizard, perhaps the land monitor (psammosaurus scincus). CHAMOIS (anti-lope rupicapra) is now totally unknown in western Asia, where it very probably never existed. The opinion of those who see it in the Hebrew zemer (Deut., xiv, 5) should consequently be entirely discarded (see Camelopardalus). CHARADRION (Hebr., ‘anaphah, Lev., xi, 19; Deut., xiv, 18) would be the plover; but it rather stands here for the heron, all the species of which (this is the sense of the expression “according to its kind”), numerous in Palestine, should be deemed unclean. CHEROGRILLUS (Lev., xi, 5; Deut., xiv, 7), a mere transliteration of the Greek name of the porcupine, corresponds to the Hebrew shaphan, translated, Ps. ciii (Hebr., civ), 18, by irchin, and Prov., xxx, 26, by rabbit. As St. Jerome noticed it, the shaphan is not the porcupine, but a very peculiar animal of about the same size, dwelling among the rocks, and in holes, and called in Palestine “bearrat”, on account of some resemblance with these two quadrupeds. We call it coney, or daman (hyrax syriacus). Its habit of lingering among the rocks is alluded to, Ps. ciii, 18; its wisdom and defenselessness, Prov., xxx, 24-26. “It cannot burrow, for it has no claws, only nails half developed; but it lies in holes in the rocks, and feeds only at dawn and dusk, always having sentries posted, at the slightest squeak from which the whole party instantly disappears. The coney is not a ruminant (cf. Lev., xi, 5), but it sits working its jaws as if rechewing. It is found sparingly in most of the rocky districts, and is common about Sinai” (Tristram). COBRA (naja aspis), most likely the deadly snake called pethen by the Hebrews, found in Palestine and Egypt and used by serpent-charmers. COCHINEAL (coccus ilicis).—A hemiptera homoptera insect very common on the Syrian holm-oak, from the female of which the crimson dye (kermes) is prepared. The complete name in Hebrew is equivalent to “scarlet insect”, the “insect” being not unfrequently omitted in the translations. COCK, HEN.—Domestic poultry are not mentioned till after the captivity. No wonder, consequently, that the three times we meet with the word cock in the D.V. it is owing to a misinterpretation of the primitive text. (I) Job, xxxviii, 36, the word sekhwi means soul, heart: “Who hath put wisdom in the heart of man? and who gave his soul understanding?” (2) Prov., xxx, 31, zarzir should be translated as “hero”. (3) Is., xxii, 17, where the word gebher, great, strong man, has been rendered according to some rabbinical conceptions. In Our Lord’s time domestic poultry, introduced from India through Persia, had become common, and their well-known habits gave rise to familiar expressions, and afforded good and easy illustrations (Mark, xiii, 35; xiv, 30, etc.). Jesus Christ compared His care for Jerusalem to that of a hen for her brood. COCKATRICE.—A fabulous serpent supposed to be produced from a cock’s egg brooded by a serpent; it was alleged that its hissing would drive away all other serpents, and that its breath, even its look, was fatal. The word is used in A.V. as the regular equivalent for Hebrew, cipher oni. Colt.—See Ass‘s COLT (sup.). CONEY.—See Cherogrillus (sup.). CORAL, Hebrew, ramoth, should probably be substituted, Job, xxviii, 18, for “eminent things”, and Ezech., xxvii, 16, for “silk” in the D.V. The coral dealt with at Tyre was that of the Red Sea or even of the Indian Ocean; coral seems to have been scarcely known among the Jews. CORMORANT (Lev., xi, 17; Deut., xiv, 17), very frequently met with on the coasts, rivers, and lakes of Palestine, probably corresponds to the shalak of the Hebrew, although this name, which means “the plunger”, might be applied to some other plunging bird. Cow.—See Cattle (Sup.). CRANE (grus cinerea).—The word does not occur in D.V., but seems the best translation of Hebrew, ‘aghzlr, read in two passages: Is., xxxviii, 14, and Jer., viii, 7, where its loud voice and migratory instincts are alluded to. There is little doubt that the two above indicated places of D.V., where we read “swallow”, should be corrected. CRICKET, a good translation for Hebr., celagal, “chirping”, which besides the feature suggested by the etymology, is described Deut., xxviii, 42, as a voracious insect. See Blast (sup.). CROCODILE.—We do not read this word in any other place than Lev., xi, 29 (D.V.), where it corresponds to the Hebrew, cab; the animal is, nevertheless, oftener spoken of in the Holy Books under cover of several metaphors: rahab, “the proud” (Is., li, 9); tannin, “the stretcher” (Ezech., xxix, 3); liweyathan (leviathan) [Ps. lxxiii (Hebr., lxxiv), 14; Job, xl, 20, xli, 25]. See Dragon (inf.). The crocodile (crocodilus vulgaris) is still found in great numbers, not only in the upper Nile, but also in Palestine. A remarkable description of the crocodile has been drawn by the author of the Book of Job. He depicts the difficulty of capturing, snaring, or taming him, his vast size, his impenetrable scales, his flashing eyes, his snorting, and his immense strength. Dreadful as he is, the crocodile was very early regarded and worshipped as a deity by the Egyptians. He is, in the Bible, the emblem of the people of Egypt and their Pharao, sometimes even of all Israel’s foes. Cucxoo, according to some, would be the bird called in Hebrew shahaph (Lev., xi, 16; Deut., xiv, 15), and there reckoned among the unclean birds. Two species, the cuculus canorus, and the oxylophus glandarius live in the Holy Land; however there is little probability that the cuckoo is intended in the mentioned passages, where we should perhaps see the shear-water and the various species of companionship.

DABOIA ZANTHINA., See Basilisk (sup.). DAMAN.—See Cherogrillus (sup.). DEER.—(Hebr., ‘ayyal). Its name is frequently read in the Scriptures, and its habits have afforded many allusions or comparisons, which fact supposes that the deer was not rare in Palestine. Its handsome form, its swiftness, its shyness, the love of the roe for her fawns, are alluded to; it seems from Prov., v, 19 and some other indirect indications that the words ‘ayyal and ‘ayyalah (deer and hind) were terms of endearment most familiar between lovers. DEMONS (Is., xxxiv, 14).—So does D.V. translate ciyyim; it is certainly a mistake. The word at issue is generally believed to refer to the hyena (hyoena striates), still found everywhere in caves and tombs. So also is the word “devils” of Bar., iv, 35. We possess no longer the Hebrew text of the latter; but it possibly contained the same word; anyway, “hyena” is unquestionably a far better translation than the mere meaningless “devils”. DIPSAS.—The D.V., following the Vulgate (Dent., viii, 15) thereby means a serpent whose bite causes a mortal thirst; but this interpretation seems to come from a misunderstanding suggested by the Septuagint; the original writer most likely intended there to mean “drought”, as the A.V. rightly puts it, and not any kind of serpent. Dog.—The dog in the East does not enjoy the companionship and friendship of man as in the western countries. Its instinct has been cultivated only in so far as the protecting of the flocks and camps against wild animals is concerned. In the towns and villages it roams in the streets and places, of which it is the ordinary scavenger; packs of dogs in a half-wild state are met with in the cities and are not unfrequently dangerous for men. For this reason the dog has always been, and is still looked upon with loathing and aversion, as filthy and unclean. With a very few exceptions, whenever the dog is spoken of in the Bible (where it is mentioned over forty times), it is with contempt, to remark either its voracious instincts, or its fierceness, or its loathsomeness; it was regarded as the emblem of lust, and of all uncleanness in general. As the Mohammedans, to the present day, term Christians “dogs”, so did the Jews of old apply that infamous name to Gentiles. Dove (Hebr., yonah).—Though distinguishing it from tor, the turtle-dove, the Jews were perfectly aware of their natural affinity and speak of them together. The dove is mentioned in the Bible oftener than any other bird (over fifty times); this comes both from the great number of doves flocking in Palestine, and of the favor they enjoy among the people. The dove is first spoken of in the record of the flood (Gen., viii, 8-12); later on we see that Abraham offered up some in sacrifice, which would indicate that the dove was very early domesticated. In fact several allusions are made to dovecotes, with their “windows” or latticed openings. But in olden times as well as now, besides the legions of pigeons that swarm around the villages, there were many more rock-doves, “doves of the valleys”, as they are occasionally termed (Ezech., vii, 16; Cant., ii, 14; Jer., xlviii, 28), that filled the echoes of the mountain gorges with the rustling of their wings. The metallic lustre of their plumage, the swiftness of their flight, their habit of sweeping around in flocks, their plaintive coo, are often alluded to by the different sacred writers. The dark eye of the dove, encircled by a line of bright red skin, is also mentioned; its gentleness and innocence made it the type of trust and love, and, most naturally, its name was one of the most familiar terms of endearment. Our Lord spoke of the dove as a symbol of simplicity; the sum of its perfections made it a fitting emblem for the Holy Spirit. DRAGON, a word frequently found in the translations of the Bible as substitute, so it seems, for other names of animals that the translators were unable to identify. It stands indeed for several Hebrew names: (I) than (Job, xxx, 29; Is., xxxiv, 13; xxxv, 7; xliii, 20; Jer., ix, 11; x, 22; xiv, 6; xlix, 33; li, 37; Mich., i, 8; Mal., i, 3), unquestionably meaning a denizen of desolate places, and generally identified with the jackal; (2) tannim, in a few passages with the sense of serpent [Deut., xxxii, 33; Ps., xc (Hebr., xci), 13; Dan., xiv, 22-27], in others most likely signifying the crocodile [Ps., lxxiii (Hebr., lxxiv), 13; Is., li, 9; Ezech., xxix, 3], or even a sea-monster (Ezech., xxxii, 2), such as a whale, porpoise, or dugong, as rightly translated Lam., iv, 3, and as probably intended Ps., cxlviii, 7; (3) liweyathan (leviathan), meaning both the crocodile [Ps., lxxiii (Hebr., lxxiv), 14] and sea-monster [Ps. ciii (Hebr., civ), 26]; (4) giyyim (Ps. lxxiii, 14; Jer., 1, 39), which possibly means the hyena. Other places, such as Esth., x, 7; xi, 6; Ecclus., xxv, 23, can be neither traced back to a Hebrew original, nor identified with sufficient probability. The author of the Apocalypse repeatedly makes mention of the dragon, by which he means “the old serpent, who is called the Devil and Satan, who seduceth the whole world” (Apoc., xii, 9, etc.). Of the fabulous dragon fancied by the ancients, represented as a monstrous winged serpent, with a crested head and enormous claws, and regarded as very powerful and ferocious, no mention whatever is to be found in the Bible. The word dragon, consequently, should really be blotted out of our Bibles, except perhaps Is., xiv, 29 and xxx, 6, where the draco fimbriatus is possibly spoken of. See Basilisk. 4 (sup.). DROMEDARY., the word so rendered, Is., Ix, 6, signifies rather a swift and finely bred camel. DUGONG., See Badger (Sup.).

EAGLE.—So is generally rendered the Hebrew, nesher, but there is a doubt as to whether the eagle or some kind of vulture is intended. It seems even probable that the Hebrews did not distinguish very carefully these different large birds of prey, and that all are spoken of as though they were of one kind. Anyway, four species of eagles are known to live in Palestine: aquila chryscetos, aquila ncevia, aquila heliaca, and circcetos gallicus. Many allusions are made to the eagle in Scripture: its inhabiting the dizziest cliffs for nesting, its keen sight, its habit of congregating to feed on the slain, its swiftness, its longevity, its remarkable care in training its young, are often referred to (see in particular Job, xxxix, 27-30). When the relations of Israel with their neighbors became more frequent, the eagle became, under the pen of the Jewish prophets and poets, an emblem first of the Assyrian, then of the Babylonian, and finally of the Persian kings. ELEPHANT.—We learn from Assyrian inscriptions that before the Hebrews settled in Syria, there existed elephants in that country, and Tiglath-Pileser I tells us about his exploits in elephant hunting. We do not read, however, of elephants in the Bible until the Machabean times. True, III Kings speaks of ivory, or “elephants’ teeth”, as the Hebrew text puts it, yet not as indigenous, but as imported from Ophir. In the postexilian times, especially in the books of the Machabees, elephants are frequently mentioned; they were an important element in the armies of the Seleucides. These animals were imported either from India or from Africa. Ericius, a Latin name of the hedgehog, preserved in the D.V. as a translation of the Hebrew word qippodh (Is., xiv, 23; xxxiv, 11; Soph., ii, 14, the word urchin has been used) and qippeiz (Is., xxxiv, 15). The above identification of the qippodh is based both on the Greek rendering and the analogy between this Hebrew word and the Talmudic (qeippadh), Syriac (qufdo’), Arabic (qunfud) and Ethiopian (qinfz) names of the hedgehog. Several scholars, however, discard this identification, because the hedgehog, contrary to the qippodh, lives neither in marshes nor ruins, and has no voice. The bittern meets all the requirements of the texts where the qippodh is mentioned. It should be noticed nevertheless that hedgehogs are far from rare in Palestine. As to the qippoz of Is., xxxiv, 15, read qippodh by some Hebrew MSS., and interpreted accordingly by the Septuagint, Vulgate and the versions derived therefrom, its identity is a much discussed question. Some, arguing from the authorities just referred to, confound it with the qippodh, whereas others deem it to be the arrow-snake; but besides that no such animal as arrow-snake is known to naturalists, the context seems to call for a bird. EWE.—The Hebrew language, generally poor, shows a remarkable opulence when there is question of all things connected with pastoral life. Six names at least, with their feminines, express the different stages of development of the sheep. Its domestication goes back to the night of time, so that the early traditions enshrined in the Bible speak of the first men as shepherds. Whatever may be thought of this point, it is out of question that from the dawn of historical times down to our own, flocks have constituted the staple of the riches of the land. The ewe of Palestine is generally the ovis laticaudata, the habits of which, resembling those of all other species of sheep, are too well known to be here dwelt upon. Let it suffice to notice that scores of allusions are made in the Holy Books to these habits as well as to the different details of the pastoral life.

FALCON., See HAWK (inf.). FALLOW-DEER (Cervus dama or dama vulgaris), believed by some to be signified by Hebrew, yahmur. The fallow-deer is scarce in the Holy Land and found only north of Mount Thabor. If it is mentioned at all in the Bible, it is probably ranked among the deer. FAWN (Prov., v, 19), for Hebrew, ya alah, feminine of ya’el which should be regularly, as it is in several passages, rendered by wild goat (ibex syriacus). See GOAT, WILD (inf.). FAUN.—An equivalent in D.V. (Jer., 1, 39), after St. Jerome, for Hebrew, ‘iyyim. St. Jerome explains that they were wild beings, denizens of deserts and woods, with a hooked nose, a horned forehead, and goat feet. He translated the Hebrew by fig-faun, adding to the original the adjective ficarii, possibly following in this the pagan idea which, supposing that figs incline to lust, regarded fig-groves a well fitted abode for fauns. The same Hebrew word is rendered Is., xiii, 22 by owls, and Is., xxxiv, 14, by monsters, which shows a great perplexity on the part of the translators. The true meaning being “howlers”, seems to point out the jackal, called the “howler” by the Arabs. FLEA, spoken of I K., xxiv, 15; xxvi, 20, as the most insignificant cause of trouble that may befall a man. FLOCK.—The flocks of Palestine include generally both sheep and goats: “The sheep eat only the fine herbage, whereas the goats browse on what the sheep refuse. They pasture and travel together in parallel columns, but seldom intermingle more closely, and at night they always classify themselves. The goats are for the most part black, the sheep white, dappled or piebald, forming a very marked contrast” (Tristram). The shepherd usually leads the flock, calling the sheep by their names from time to time; in his footsteps follows an old he-goat, whose stately bearing affords to the natives matter for several comparisons; the Arabs, indeed to this day, call a man of stately mien a “he-goat”. The shepherd at sunset waters his flock, folds them ordinarily in some of the many caves found on every hillside, and with trained dogs guards them at night.

FLY., Two Hebrew words are thus translated: (I) ‘arobh is the name of the Egyptian fly of the fourth plague; this name, a collective one, though translated by dog-fly in the Septuagint, seems to signify all kinds of flies. Flies are at all times an almost insufferable nuisance; the common house-fly, with the gnat, vexes men, while gadflies of every description tsetse, cestru, hip poboscida, tabanus marocanus, etc., infest animals. (2) Zebhabh is likewise the collective name of the Palestinian fly, but more specifically of the gadfly. Though a trifle less annoying than in Egypt, flies were, however, deemed a plague severe enough in Palestine to induce the natives to have recourse to the power of a special god, Ba’al-zebhubh, the master of the flies, that they and their cattle be protected against that scourge. FOWL.—This word which, in its most general sense, applies to anything that flies in the air (Gen., i, 20, 21), and which frequently occurs in the Bible with this meaning, is also sometimes used in a narrower sense, as, for instance, III K., iv, 23, where it stands for all fatted birds that may be reckoned among the delicacies of a king’s table; so likewise Gen., xv, 11 and Is., xviii, 6, where it means birds of prey in general. In this latter signification allusions are made to their habit of perching on bare or dead trees, or of flocking together in great numbers. Fox.—Thus is usually rendered the Hebrew, shu’al, which signifies both fox and jackal, even the latter more often than the former. The fox, however, was well known by the ancient Hebrews, and its cunning was as proverbial among them as among us (Ezech., xiii, 4; Luke, xiii, 32). FROG. Though not rare in Palestine, this word is only mentioned in the O. T. in connection with the second plague of Egypt. Two species of frogs are known to live in the Holy Land: the rana esculenta, or common edible frog, and the hyla arborea, or green tree-frog. The former throngs wherever there is water. In Apoc., xvi, 13, the frog is the emblem of unclean spirits.

GAZELLE (Hebr., cebi, i.e. beauty) has been known at all times as one of the most graceful of all animals. Several species still exist in Palestine. Its different characteristics, its beauty of form, its swiftness, its timidity, the splendor and meekness of its eye, are in the present time, as well as during the age of the O. T. writers, the subjects of many comparisons. However, the name of the gazelle is scarcely, if at all, to be found in the Bible; in its stead we read roe, hart, or deer. Like a few other names of graceful and timid animals, the word gazelle has always been in the East a term of endearment in love. It was also a woman’s favorite name (I Par., viii, 9; IV K., xii, 1; II Par., xxiv, 1; Acts, ix, 36). GECKO.—Probable translation of the ‘anaqah of the Hebrews, generally rendered in our versions by shrew-mouse, for which it seems it should be substituted. The gecko, ptyodactylus gecko of the naturalists, is common in Palestine. GIEREAGLE., SO does A.V. render the Hebrew, raham (Lev., xi, 18) or rahamah (Deut., xiv, 17). By the gier-eagle, the Egyptian vulture (neophron percnopterus), or Pharao‘s hen, is generally believed to be signified. However, whether this bird should be really recognized in the Hebrew, raham, is not easy to decide; for while, on the one hand, the resemblance of the Arabic name for the Egyptian vulture with the Hebrew word raham seems fairly to support the identification, the mention of the raham in a list of wading birds, on the other hand, casts a serious doubt on its correctness. GIRAFFE.—See CAMELOPARDALUS (sup.). GNAT.—The same insect called sciniph in Ex., viii, 16, 17 and Ps. civ (Hebr., cv), 31, and known under the familiar name of mosquito, culex pipiens, is taken in the New Testament as an example of a trifle. GOAT.—Though the sacred writers spoke of the ewe more frequently than of the goat, yet with the latter they were very well acquainted. It was indeed, especially in the hilly regions east of the Jordan, an important item in the wealth of the Israelites. The goat of Palestine, particularly the capra membrica, affords numerous illustrations and allusions. Its remarkably long ears are referred to by Amos, iii, 12; its glossy dark hair furnishes a graphic comparison to the author of Cant., iv, 1; vi, 4; this hair was woven into a strong cloth; the skin tanned with the hair on served to make bottles for milk, wine, oil, water, etc. The kid was an almost essential part of a feast. The goat is mentioned in Dan., viii, 5, as the symbol of the Macedonian empire. The grand Gospel scene of the separation of the just and the wicked on the last day is borrowed from the customs of the shepherds in the East. GOAT, WILD, Job, xxxix, 1; I K., xxiv, 3, where it is an equivalent for ya’ el, translated, Ps., ciii (Hebr., civ), 18, by hart, Prov., v, 19, by fawn, is most probably the ibex syriacus, a denizen of the rocky summits [Ps. ciii (Hebr., civ), 18]. It was regarded as a model of grace (Prov., v, 19), and its name, Jahel, Jahala, was frequently given to persons (Judges, v, 6; I, Esd., ii, 56, etc.). GRASS-HOPPER, is probably the best rendering for the Hebrew, hagab [Lev., xi, 22; Num., xiii, 34 (Hebr., xiii, 33); Is., xl, 22; Eccles., xii, 5, etc.], as in the A.V., if the Hebrew word be interpreted “hopper” as Credner suggests; the D.V. uses the word locust. The grasshopper is one of the smaller species of the locust tribe. GRIFFON.—SO D.V., Lev., xi, 13 (whereas Deut., xiv, 12, we read “grype”) translates the Hebrew, peres, the “breaker” whereby the lammergeyer or bearded vulture, gypcetus barbatus, the largest and most magnificent of the birds of prey is probably intended. The opinion that the Bible here speaks of the fabulous griffon, i.e. a monster begotten from a lion and an eagle, and characterized by the beak, neck, and wings of an eagle and the legs and rump of a lion, is based only on a misinterpretation of the word. GRIFFON-VULTURE, a probable translation in several cases of the Hebrew, nether, regularly rendered by eagle. This most majestic bird (gyps fulvus), the type, as it seems, of the eagle-headed figures of Assyrian sculpture, is most likely referred to in Mich., i, 16, on account of its bare neck and head. GRYPE, Deut., xiv, 12. See GRIFFON (sup.).

HAJE.—See Asp (sup.). HARE.—Mentioned Lev., xi, 6; Deut., xiv, 7, in the list of the unclean quadrupeds. Several species live in Palestine: lepus syriacus in the north; lepus judoeoe in the south and the Jordan valley, together with lepus sinaiticus, lepus cegyptiacus and lepus isabellinus. The statement of the Bible that the hare “cheweth the cud” is a classical difficulty. It should be noticed that this is not the reason why the hare is reckoned among the unclean animals; but the cause thereof should be sought for in the fact that though it chews the cud, which certainly it appears to do, it does not divide the hoof. HART and HIND.—Either the fallow-deer, still occasionally found in the Holy Land, or the red deer, now extinct, or the deer generally. It has afforded many illustrations to the Biblical writers and poets, especially by its fleetness (Cant., ii, 9; Is., xxxv, 6), its surefootedness [Ps. xvii (Hebr., xviii), 34; Hab., iii, 19], its affection (Prov., v, 19), and its habit of hiding its young (Job, xxxix, 1). HAWK (Hebr., nec) is, in the Scriptures, a general denomination including, with the falcon, all the smaller birds of prey, the kestrel, merlin, sparrow-hawk, hobby, and others, most common in Palestine. NIGHT-HAWK, A.V. for Hebrew, tahmas, more exactly translated in D.V. by owl; some bird of the latter kind is indeed undoubtedly intended, probably the barn owl (strix flammea). SPARROW-HAWK (falco nisus), one of the hawks of Palestine, so common that it might be regarded, in reference to the Bible, as the hawk par excellence. HEDGEHOG., See Ericius (sup.). HEN.—See COCK (sup.). HERON.—Mentioned Lev., xi, 19, in the list of unclean birds, but probably in the wrong place in the D.V.; heron, indeed, should be substituted for charadrion, whereas in the same verse it stands for stork, as the A.V. correctly states it. HIND.—see Hart (Sup.). Hippopotamus

.—See Behemoth (sup.). HOBBY (falco subbuteo). See HAWK (sup.). Hoopoe.—See Hoop (inf.). HORNET (Hebr., cire`ah; vespa crabro).—One of the largest and most pugnacious wasps; when disturbed they attack cattle and horses; their sting is very severe, capable not only of driving men and cattle to madness, but even of killing them (Exod., xxiii, 28; Deut., vii, 20; Jos., x) dv, 12). Horse.—The horse is never mentioned in Scripture in connection with the patriarchs; the first time the Bible speaks of it, it is in reference to the Egyptian army pursuing the Hebrews. During the epoch of the conquest and of Judges, we hear of horses only with the Chanaanean troops, and later on with the Philistines. The hilly country inhabited by the Israelites was not favorable to the use of the horse; this is the reason why the Bible speaks of horses only in connection with war. David and Solomon established a cavalry and chariot force; but even this, used exclusively for wars of conquest, seems to have been looked upon as a dangerous temptation to kings, for the Deuteronomy legislation forbids them to multiply horses for themselves. The grand description of the war-horse in Job is classical; it will be noticed, however, that its praises are more for the strength than for the swiftness of the horse. The prophet Zacharias depicts (ix, 10) the Messianic age as one in which no hostilities will be heard of; then all warlike apparel being done away with, the horse will serve only for peaceful use. Holm (Lev., xi, 19; Deut., xiv, 18).—The analogy of the Hebrew with the Syriac and Coptic for the name of this bird makes the identification doubtless, although some, after the example of the A.V., see in the Hebrew dukhiphath, the lapwing. The Egyptians worshipped the houp and made it the emblem of Horns. HYENA.—This word is not to be found in any of the English translations of the Bible; it occurs twice in the Septuagint, Jer., xii, 9, and Ecclus., xiii, 22, being in both places the rendering for the Hebrew name gabhi9.a. The hyenas are very numerous in the Holy Land, where they are most active scavengers; they feed upon dead bodies, and sometimes dig the tombs open to get at the corpses therein buried. Two Hebrew names are supposed to designate the hyena: (I) cabhua’. This word, which has been interpreted “speckled bird”, Jer., xii, 9, by modern translators following the Vulgate, has been rendered by “holy man”, Ecclus., xiii, 22. Despite the authorities that favor the above mentioned translation of Jer., xii, 9, the consistency of the Septuagint on the one hand, and on the other the parallelism in the latter passage, in addition to the analogy with the Arabic and rabbinical Hebrew names for the hyena, fairly support the identification of the cabhua` with this animal. (2) ciyyim, rendered in diverse manners in different places: wild beasts, Is., xiii, 21; demons, Is., xxxiv, 14; dragons, Ps. lxxiii (Hebr., lxxiv), 14; Jer., 1, 39.

IBEX.—See GOAT, WILD (sup.). IBIS.—The word occurs twice in the D.V. (Lev., xi, 17; Is., xxxiv, 11) as an equivalent for yanshuph; some good authorities, however, though the yanshuph is mentioned among wading birds, do not admit the above identification and think that the Egyptian eagle-owl (bubo ascalaphus), which they term great owl, is spoken of. The ibis was worshipped by the Egyptians as the emblem of Thot. ICHNEUMON., See Weasel (inf.). IRCHIN., D.V. PS. ciii, 18. See Cherogrillus (sup.).

JACKAL.—Frequently alluded to in Holy Writ, though the name is read neither in the D.V. nor in any of the western translations, probably because the animal, however common in Africa and southwestern Asia is unknown in European countries. The name regularly substituted for jackal is fox. The jackal seems to be designated in Hebrew by three different names: sha’al, “the digger”; ‘iyyim, “the howlers”; and tan, ” the stretcher”, although we are unable to state the differences marked by these three names. Numerous references may be found throughout the Bible to the jackal’s howlings and gregarious habits. JERBOA.—This little animal, at least four species of which abide in Syria, is nowhere nominally mentioned in the Bible; it must, nevertheless, very probably be reckoned among the unclean animals indicated under the general name of mouse.

KESTREL.—A slender hawk, most likely one of the species intended by Lev., xi, 16, for it is very common in Palestine. The remark of Job, xxxix, 26, strikingly points out the tinnulus cenchris, one of the Palestinian kestrels. Km.—See GOAT (sup.). KINE.—See CATTLE (sup.). KITE.—AS suggested by the analogy with the Arabic, the black kite (milvus nigrans) is probably meant by Hebr. da’ah or dayyah (Lev., xi, 14; Deut., xiv, 13; Is., xxxiv, 15), interpreted kite in the D.V.; it is one of the most common of the scavenger birds of prey of the country, and for this reason, is carefully protected by the villagers. Other kinds of kites, in particular the milvus regalis, are common in Palestine.

LAMB.—The Paschal Lamb was both a commemoration of the deliverance from the bondage in Egypt, and a prophetic figure of the Son of God sacrificed to free His people from their slavery to sin and death. See Ewu. (sup.) LAMIA (IS., xxxiv, 14).—Is a translation of Hebrew, lilith; according to the old popular legends, the lamia was a feminine bloodthirsty monster, devouring men and children. In the above cited place, some kind of owl, either the screech or the hooting owl, is very probably meant. LAMMERGEYER (gypeetus barbatus), very likely signified by the Hebrew, pert?, translated by griffon in D.V. LARDS.—Lev., xi, 16; Deut., xiv, 15. See Cuckoo (sup.). HORSE-LEECH (Proy., xxx, 15).—Both the medicinal leech and the horse-leech are frequently found in the streams, pools, and wells; they often attach themselves to the inside of the lips and nostrils of drinking animals, thereby causing them much pain. LEOPARD.—Under this name come a certain number of carnivorous animals more or less resembling the real leopard (felis leopardus), namely felis jubata, felis lynx, felis uncia, etc., all formerly numerous throughout Palestine, and even now occasionally found, especially in the woody districts. The leopard is taken by the Biblical writers as a type of cunning (Jer., v, 6; Osee, xiii, 7), of fierceness, of a conqueror’s sudden swoop (Dan., vii, 6; Hab., i, 8). Its habit of lying in wait by a well or a village is repeatedly alluded to. LEVIATHAN.—The word Leviathan (Hebrew, liweyathan), which occurs six times in the Hebrew Bible, seems to have puzzled not a little all ancient translators. The D.V. has kept this name, Job, iii, 8; xl, 20; Is., xxvii, 1; it is rendered by dragon Ps. lxxiii (Hebr., lxxiv), 14, and ciii (Hebr., civ), 26; The word leviathan means: (I) crocodile (Job, xl, 20 and Ps. lxxiii, 14); (2) a sea-monster (Ps. ciii, 26, Is., xxvii, 1); (3) possibly the Draco constellation (Job, iii, 8). LION.—Now extinct in Palestine and in the surrounding countries, the lion was common there during the O. T. times; hence the great number of words in the Hebrew language to signify it; under one or another of these names it is mentioned a hundred and thirty times in the Scriptures, as the classical symbol of strength, power, courage, dignity, ferocity. Very likely as the type of power, it became the ensign of the tribe of Juda; so was it employed by Solomon in the decoration of the temple and of the king’s house. For the same reason, Apoc., v, 5, represents Jesus Christ as the lion of the tribe of Juda. The craft and ferocity of the lion, on the other hand, caused it to be taken as an emblem of Satan (I Pet., v, 8) and of the enemies of the truth (II Tim., iv, 17). LIZARD.—Immense is the number of these reptiles in Palestine; no less than forty-four species are found there. Among those mentioned in the Bible we may cite: (I) The Leta’ah, general name of the lizard, applied especially to the common lizard, the green lizard, the blind worm, etc.; (2) the chomet, or sand-lizard; (3) the cab, or Babb of the Arabs (uromastix spinipes); (4) the koah, the diverse kinds of monitor (psammosaurus scincus, hydrosaurus niloticus, etc.); (5) the ‘anagah or gecko; (6) the semamith or stellio. Locust.—One of the worst scourges of the East, very often referred to in Holy Writ. As many as nine Hebrew words signify either the locust in general or some species: (I) ‘arbeh, probably the locusta migratoria; (2) gazam, possibly the locust in its larva state, the palmerworm; (3) Gobh, the locust in general; (4) chagab, most likely the grasshopper; (5) hasil, “the destroyer”, perhaps the locust in its caterpillar state, in which it is most destructive; (6) hargol, translated in the D.V. ophiomachus; (7) yeleq, the stinging locust; (8) celacal possibly the cricket; and (9) sol am, rendered by attacus, or bald locust (probably the truxalis). Unlike other insects, locusts are most voracious in every stage of their existence. Louse.—According to some this species of vermin was one of the features of the third Egyptian plague. It is but too common through all eastern countries.

MILDEW.—A word occurring a certain number of times in the D.V. as an equivalent for Hebrew, hasril, which probably means a kind of locust. MOLE.—Two Hebrew words are thus rendered. The first, tinshemeth (Lev., xi, 30), would, according to good authorities, rather signify the chameleon; with the second, hapharperoth (Is., ii, 20), some burrowing animal is undoubtedly intended. The mole of Syria is not the common mole of Europe, talpa europera, but the mole-rat (spalax tyhlus), a blind burrowing rodent. MOSQUITO.—See GNAT (sup.). MOTH.—Is in the D.V. besides Is., xiv, 11, where it stands for rimmah, “worms”, the common rendering for two words: ‘ash (Job, iv, 19), and sag (Is., li, 8), the exact meaning of the former is uncertain, whereas by the latter the clothes moth is meant. MOUFLON., See CHAMOIS, Camelopardalus Mouse.—This word seems to be a general one, including the various rats, dormice, jerboas, and hamsters, about twenty-five species of which exist in the country. MULE.—In spite of the enactment of the Law (Lev., xix, 19), the Israelites early in the course of their history possessed mules; these animals, in a hilly region such as the Holy Land, were for many purposes preferable to horses and stronger than asses; they were employed both for domestic and warlike use.

OPHIOMACHUS.—See LOCUST (sup.). ORYX.—See Antelope (Sup.). OSPREY (Hebr., ozniyyah).—The fishing eagle, which name probably signifies all the smaller eagles. OSSIFRAGE.—See Lammergeyer (sup.). OSTRICH.—Still occasionally found in the southeastern deserts of Palestine, the ostrich, if we are to judge from the many mentions made of it, was well known among the Hebrews. The beauty of its plumage, its fleetness, its reputed stupidity, its leaving its eggs on the sand and hatching them by the sun’s heat are repeatedly alluded to. Owl.—A generic name under which many species of nocturnal birds are designated, some having a proper name in the Hebrew, some others possessing none. Among the former we may mention the little owl (athene persica), the Egyptian eagle-owl (bubo ascalephus), the great owl of some authors, called ibis in the D.V., the screech or hooting owl, probably the 1111th of Is., xxxiv, and the lamia of St. Jerome and the D.V.; the barn owl (stryx flammea), possibly corresponding to the tahmas of the Hebrews and rendered by night-hawk in the A.V.; and the gippoz of Is., xxxiv, 15, as yet unidentified. Ox.—See CATTLE (sup.). Ox, WILD, Is., li, 20, probably antilope bubalis. See ANTELOPE (Sup.).

PALMERWORM (Hebr., gazam).—A general word for the locust, very likely in its larva state. PARTRIDGE.—Although very common in the Holy Land, the partridge is mentioned only three times in the sacred literature: I K., xxvi, 20 alludes to chasing it on the mountains; Jer., xvii, 11, to the robbing of its eggs; Ecclus., xi, 32, to the keeping a decoy partridge. Two kinds of partridges are known to abide in the hilly resorts of Palestine; the francolin inhabits the plains, and various sand-grouse are found in the deserts. PEACOCK.—The texts where it is spoken of (III K., x, 22; II Par., ix, 21) clearly indicate that it was not indigenous to Palestine, but imported, probably from India. PELICAN, D.V., Ps., ci (Hebr., cii), 7, for Hebr. ga’ath, in other places is rendered by bittern, for which it might be advantageously substituted. Pelicans are usually found about marshes (Is., xxxiv, 11), and are in the habit of sitting for hours in sandy desolate places [Ps., ci (Hebr., cii), 7; Soph., ii, 14] after they have gorged. PHOENIX might possibly be read instead of palmtree (Hebr. hal) in Job, xxix, 18, where the belief in its immortality seems referred to; however the sense adopted by D.V., after Vulgate and Septuagint, should not be slighted. PIGEON.—See Dove (Sup.). PLUNGER., See Cormorant (Sup.). Porcupine., Believed by some, on account of a certain analogy of the Hebrew gippdd with the Arabic name of this animal, to be spoken of in the Bible. See Ericius (Sup.) PORPHYRION is in Vulgate and D.V. (Lev., xi, 18), the equivalent for the Hebrew, raham, translated in the Septuagint by “swan”; in the Greek version, porphyrion stands for the Hebrew, tinshemeth, interpreted “swan” by the Latin and English Bibles. The hypothesis that the Greek translators used a Hebrew text in which the two words raham and tinshemeth stood contrariwise to their present order in the Massoretic text, might account for this difference. This hypothesis is all the more probable because in Deut., xiv, 17, porphyrion seems to be the Greek translation for raham. Whatever this may be, whether the porphyrion, or purple water-hen (porphyrio antiquorum), or the Egyptian vulture, should be identified with the raham remains uncertain. See GIER-EAGLE (Sup.) PYGARG (Deut., xiv, 5).—This word, a mere adaptation from the Greek, means “white-rumped”, a character common to many species, though the antilope addax is possibly signified by the Hebrew word dishon.

QUAIL.—The description given Ex., xvi, 11-13: Num., xi, 31, 32; Ps., lxxvii (Hebr., lxxviii) 27-35, and civ (Hebr., cv), 40, the references to their countless flocks, their low flying, their habit of alighting on land in the morning, together with the analogy of the Hebrew and Arabic names, make it certain that the common quail (coturnix vulgaris) is intended.

RABBIT (Prow., xxx, 26).—A mistranslation for coney or daman. See CHEROGRILLUS, (sup.) RAM.—See EWE, FLOCK (sup.). RAVEN.—The Bible includes under this generic name a certain number of birds having more or less resemblance with the raven, such as the magpie, the jay, etc. The raven, eight species of which are found in Palestine, is by far the most common of all the birds of that country, where it is with buzzards, vultures, dogs, jackals, and hyenas, an active scavenger. Its plumage is glossy black, and its habits are frequently alluded to in Holy Writ, for instance feeding on carcasses, wandering for its precarious meals, picking out the eyes of the newly-dropped or weakly animals, resorting to desolate places, etc. The raven, when no other food is nigh, not unfrequently picks out grains freshly sown; hence its surname of seed-picker, spermologos, which, later on became a synonym for ragamuffin. This name, applied to St. Paul by his sceptical listeners of Athens, has become, through a mistranslation, “word-sower” in our Bibles (Acts, xvii, 18). NIGHT-RAVEN, the equivalent in Ps. ci (Hebr., cii), 7, of the Hebrew word translated Lev., xi, 17, by screech-owl, seems to mean the blue thrush (petrocynela cyanea), a well-known solitary bird of the country, which is fond of sitting alone on a roof or a rock. RHINOCEROS, Num., xxiii, 22, stands for Hebrew, re’em, and should consequently be rendered by aurochs. RINGTAIL.—SO D.V., Deut., xiv, 13, translates ra’ah, possibly substituted by a scribe’s error for da’ah, and very likely meaning the black kite (milvus migrans).

SATYR.—SO is the Hebrew sa’ir rendered Is., xiii, 21, and xxxiv, 14, by R.V. (D.V.: “hairy one”). The same word in Lev., xvii, 7, and II Par., xi, 15, is translated “devils” in all English Bibles. Sa’ir usually signifies the he-goat. In the latter passages this sense is clearly inapplicable; it seems hardly applicable in the former. The writers of Leviticus, and II Paralipomenon possibly intended some representation of the same description as the goat-headed figures of the Egyptian Pantheon. Concerning the air mentioned in Isaias, no satisfactory explanation has as yet been given. SCARLET.—See COCHINEAL (Sup.). SCINIPH.—See GNAT (sup.). SCORPION.—Very common in all hot, dry, stony places; is taken as an emblem of the wicked. SEA-GULL.—Its different kinds are probably signified by the word translated larus. See Cucxoo (Slip.). SEAL.—See BADGER (Sup.). SEA-MONSTER, Lam., iv, 3, probably means such animals as the whale, porpoise, dugong, etc. SERPENT.—A generic term whereby all ophidia are designated; ten names of different species of snakes are given in the Bible. SHREW.—So does D.V. translate the Hebr. ‘anagah, which however means rather some kind of lizard, probably the gecko. SIREN, Is., xiii, 22, a translation for Hebrew tan, which indicates an animal dwelling in ruins, and may generally be rendered by jackal. No other resemblance than a verbal one should be sought between this tan and the fabulous being, famous by its allurements, called Siren by the ancient poets. SNAIL should be read instead of wax, Ps., lvii (Hebr., lviii) 9, to translate the Hebrew, shabelitl. Unlike the snails of northern climates which hibernate, those of Palestine sleep in summer. The Psalmist alludes “to the fact that very commonly, when they have secured themselves in some chink of the rocks for their summer sleep, they are still exposed to the sun rays, which gradually evaporate and dry up the whole of the body, till the animal is shrivelled to a thread, and, as it were, melted away” (Tristram). SPARROW.—The Hebrew word cippor, found over forty times, is a general name for all small passerine birds, of which there exist about a hundred and fifty species in the Holy Land. SPIDER.—An insect living by millions in Palestine, where several hundred species have been distinguished. Its web affords a most popular illustration for frail and ephemeral undertakings (Job, viii, 14; Is., lix, 5); in three passages, however, the translators seem to have wrongly written spider for moth [Ps. xxxviii (Hebr., xxxix), 12], sigh [Ps. lxxxix (xc), 9], and pieces (Os., viii, 6). STORK.—The Hebrew word holsidhah, erroneously rendered “heron” by the Douay translators, Lev., xi, 19, alludes to the well-known affection of the stork for its young. Several passages have reference to this bird, its periodical migrations (Jer., viii, 7), its nesting in fir-trees, its black pinions stretching from its white body (Zach., v, 9; D.V., kite; but the stork, ht. sidhah, is mentioned in the Hebrew text). Two kinds, the white and the black stork, live in Palestine during the winter. SWALLOW., Two words are so rendered: deror, “the swift flyer”, which means the chimney swallow and other species akin to it [Ps. lxxxiii (Hebr., lxxxiv), 4; D.V., turtle; Prov., xxvi, 2; D.V., sparrow], whereas sill or sis may be translated by “swift”, this bird being probably intended in Is., xxxviii, 14, and Jer., viii, 7. SWAN.—Mentioned only in the list of unclean birds (Lev., xi, 18; Deut., xiv, 16). The swan having always been very rare in Syria, there was little need of forbidding to eat its flesh; by the Hebrew tinshemeth, some other bird might possibly be designated. SWINE.—The most abhorred of all animals among the Jews; hence the swineherd’s was the most degrading employment (Luke, xv, 15; cf. Matt., viii, 32). Swine are very seldom kept in Palestine. TIGER, Job, iv, 11 (Hebr., layish), should be “lion”. TURTLE.—See DOVE (sup.).

UNICORN.—See AUROCHS (Sup.). URCHIN, Soph., ii, 14. See Ericius (sup.).

VIPER.—See Asp (sup.). VULTURE.—So does D.V. render the Hebrew, ‘ayyah, Lev., xi, 14; Deut., xiv, 13; Job, xxviii, 7. As has been suggested above, the text of Job at least, seems to allude to the kite rather than to the vulture. Several kinds of vultures are nevertheless referred to in the Bible; so, for instance, the bearded vulture (gyptetus barbatus), called griffon in the D.V.; the griffon-vulture (gyps fulvus), the Egyptian vulture (neophron percnopterus), etc. In the biblical parlance vultures are oftentimes termed eagles.

WATERHEN.—See PORPHYRION (Sup.). WEASEL, Lev., xi, 29, must be regarded as a general name, probably designating, besides the weasel proper, the polecat and ichneumon, all very common in the Holy Land. WHALE (Gen., i, 21).—Tannim would perhaps be better translated generally “sea-monster”; porpoises and dugongs were certainly known to the Hebrews. WOLF.—Frequently mentioned in the Scriptures as a special foe to flocks (Ecclus., xiii, 21; Matt., vii, 15), and an emblem of treachery, ferocity, and bloodthirstiness. Wolves usually prowl at night around the sheepfolds, and, though fewer in numbers than jackals, are much more harmful. The tribe of Benjamin, owing to its warlike character, was compared to a wolf. WORM.—In English the translation for two Hebrew words: rimmah [Exod., xvi, 24; Is., xiv, 11; (Job, vii, 5, A.V.)]; and told` (Exod., xvi, 20, etc.); these two Hebrew words are general; the former designates particularly all living organisms generated and swarming in decaying or rotten substances; the latter includes not only worms, but also such insects as caterpillars, centipedes, etc.


Did you like this content? Please help keep us ad-free
Enjoying this content?  Please support our mission!