Communion of Children
(1) the ancient practice, and (2) the present discipline of the Church
Communion of Children. — In order to get some insight into the historical aspect of this subject it will be useful to dwell upon (I) the ancient practice, and (2) the present discipline of the Church in regard to the Communion of children.
(I) Ancient PRACTICE.—It is now well established that in the early days of Christianity it was not uncommon for infants to receive Communion immediately after they were baptized. Among others St. Cyprian (Lib. de Lapsis, c. xxv) makes reference to the practice. In the East the custom was pretty universal, and even to this day exists in some places, but in the West infant Communion was not so general. Here, moreover, it was restricted to the occasions of baptism and dangerous illness. Probably it originated in a mistaken notion of the absolute necessity of the Blessed Eucharist for salvation, founded on the words of St. John (vi, 54).
In the reign of Charlemagne an edict was published by a Council of Tours (813) prohibiting the reception by young children of Communion unless they were in danger of death (Zaccaria, Bibl. Rit., II, p. 161) and Odo, Bishop of Paris, renewed this prohibition in 1175. Still the custom died hard, for we find traces of it in Hugh of St. Victor (De Saer., I, e. 20) and Martene (De Ant. Eee. Rit., I bk., I, c. 15) alleges that it had not altogether disappeared in his own day.
The manner of Communicating infants was by dipping the finger in the consecrated chalice and then applying it to the tongue of the child. This would seem to imply that it was only the Precious Blood that was administered, but evident is not wanting to show that the other Consecrated Species was also given in similar circumstances. (cf. Sebastiano Giribaldi, Op. Mor., I, c. 72). That in (ants and children not yet come to the use of reason may not only validly but even fruitfully receive the Blessed Eucharist is now the universally received Communion of Saints (communio sanctorum, opinion, but it is opposed to Catholic teaching to hold gk KoLvwvia c?yiwv, a fellowship of, or with, the saints), the that this sacrament is necessary for their salvation doctrine expressed in the second clause of the ninth (Council of Trent, Sess. XXI, can. iv) article in the received text of the Apostles’ Creed: I
II. PRESENT DISCIPLINE.—The existing legislation believe the Holy Catholic Church, the regard to the Communion of children has been definitely settled by the Fourth Lateran Council, was afterwards confirmed by the authority of Council of Trent. According to its provisions children may not be admitted to the Blessed Eucharist until they have attained to years of discretion, but Caesarius of Arles (c. 543); in the “De Spiritu Sancto” when this period is reached then they are bound to receive this sacrament. When may they be said to have of attained the age of discretion? In the best-supported view of theologians this phrase means, not the attainment of a definite number of years, but rather the arrival at a certain stage in mental development, when children become able to discern the Eucharistic from ordinary bread, to realize in some measure the dignity and excellence of the Sacrament of the Altar, to believe in the Real Presence, and adore Christ under the sacramental veils. De Lugo says that if children are observed to assist at Mass with devotion and attention it is a sign that they are come to this discretion.
Thus it is seen that a keener religious sense, so to speak is demanded for the reception of than for confession. Moreover, it is agreed that children in danger of death ought to be admitted to Communion even though they may not have the same degree fitness that would be required in ordinary circumstances. In answer to a question as to whether a certain episcopal ordinance should be upheld that fixed a definite age-limit under which children could not be admitted to First Communion, the Congregation of Catholic the Council replied in the affirmative, provided, however, that those children adjudged to have reached the discretion required by the Councils Trent might not be excluded (July 21, 1888). This reply bears out the interpretation already given of the “the years of discretion” and it may be said in the words of the Catechism of the Council of Trent (pt. II, c. iv, q. 63) that “no one can better determine the age than their parents and confessor”.
The duty of preparing candidates for First Communion is the most important that can fall to the lot of a pastor (O’Kane, Rubrics of Rom. Rit., p. 391). This is amply recognized by the Church in every country, for almost every diocese has its statutes regulating with scrupulous exactness all the preliminaries of this and of their partaking of the fruits of the Redemption sacred and solemn event (cf. Deer. of III Plen. Bait., (I Cor., i, 2—Greek Text). A long course of religious instruction is usually prescribed while the moral training and virtuous formation of the mind is also urgently insisted upon.
In regard to First Communion it may be observed: (I) that it should take place during pascal time; (2) that it should be received as a rule in the parochial church, unless the consent of the pastor is had for receiving it elsewhere; (3) that no effort should be spared to fix the occasion indelibly on the mind of the young communicant; and (4) that for this purpose the Mass at which it is received should be celebrated with special solemnity, boys and girls being suitably attired and assigned to separate sections of the Church. A short address may be given in this case immediately before the distribution of Communion (De Herdt, Praxis Lit., I, 277; Rom. Rit., De only in so far as they integrate the transcendent idea Euch., t. XXIII). The decree “Sacra Tridentina Synodus”, published December, 1905, about daily Communion applies to all persons, young and old, who have formally made their First Communion (Anal. Eccl., 1906, p. 833).