<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
 <channel>
  <title><![CDATA[Dr. Karlo]]></title>
  <description><![CDATA[Dr. Karlo is a video podcast that helps Catholics confidently understand, explain, and defend their faith through thoughtful, charitable answers grounded in Scripture, theology, and philosophy.]]></description>
  <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk</link>
  <generator>Catholic Answers</generator>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 05:23:27 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <language><![CDATA[en]]></language>
  <itunes:author>Catholic Answers</itunes:author>
  <itunes:summary>Dr. Karlo is a video podcast that helps Catholics confidently understand, explain, and defend their faith through thoughtful, charitable answers grounded in Scripture, theology, and philosophy.</itunes:summary>
  <itunes:owner>
   <itunes:name>Catholic Answers</itunes:name>
   <itunes:email>radio@catholic.com</itunes:email>
  </itunes:owner>
  <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:category text="Religion &amp; Spirituality">
   <itunes:category text="Christianity"/>
  </itunes:category>
  <itunes:image href="https://www.catholic.com/images/podcasts/drk_podcast_3000x3000.jpg"/>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#29 Is Religious Belief a Cop Out? Debunking the &#8216;Thinking is Hard&#8217; Claim - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Is religious belief really just a “cop-out” for people who don’t want to think? In this episode, I respond to the popular atheist slogan “Religion… because thinking is hard” by exploring what belief actually is and that Christian belief does involve careful, hard intellectual work. ]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/is-religious-belief-a-cop-out-debunking-the-thinking-is-hard-claim</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/is-religious-belief-a-cop-out-debunking-the-thinking-is-hard-claim</guid>
   <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Is-Religious-Belief-a-Cop-Out_1.mp3" length="22419008" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Is religious belief really just a “cop-out” for people who don’t want to think? In this episode, I respond to the popular atheist slogan “Religion… because thinking is hard” by exploring what belief actually is and that Christian belief does involve careful, hard intellectual work. </itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Religion-is-for-the-Ignorant-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#28 Why a Bible Christian Should Believe Mary as Mother of God - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Is calling Mary the Mother of God biblical? This episode explores key passages like Luke 1:43 and Galatians 4:4, along with early Christian testimony and even Reformers like Martin Luther and John Calvin, to show why this ancient title flows directly from Scripture and historic Christian belief.
TRANSCRIPT:
The Council of Ephesus in A.D. 431 declared Mary to be the Theotokos—the God-bearer. In other words, it proclaimed Mary to be the Mother of God.
But should a Bible Christian believe that? Is there any evidence from Scripture that Mary is the Mother of God?
Stick around—and you’ll find out.
...]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/why-a-bible-christian-should-believe-mary-as-mother-of-god</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/why-a-bible-christian-should-believe-mary-as-mother-of-god</guid>
   <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Why-a-Bible-Christian-Should-Believe-Mary-as-Mother-of-God_raw_1.mp3" length="21454528" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Is calling Mary the Mother of God biblical? This episode explores key passages like Luke 1:43 and Galatians 4:4, along with early Christian testimony and even Reformers like Martin Luther and John Calvin, to show why this ancient title flows directly from Scripture and historic Christian belief.
TRANSCRIPT:
The Council of Ephesus in A.D. 431 declared Mary to be the Theotokos—the God-bearer. In other words, it proclaimed Mary to be the Mother of God.
But should a Bible Christian believe that? Is there any evidence from Scripture that Mary is the Mother of God?
Stick around—and you’ll find out.
...</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Mary-Mother-of-God-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#027 Evangelization, the Papacy, and My Journey of Faith (Interview) - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[In this episode of Dr. Karlo, Karlo Broussard reflects on his journey from Cajun musician to Catholic apologist while discussing evangelization, the papacy, Protestantism, philosophy, and the intellectual coherence of the Catholic faith.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/evangelization-the-papacy-and-my-journey-of-faith-interview</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/evangelization-the-papacy-and-my-journey-of-faith-interview</guid>
   <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 14:14:44 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Evangelization-the-Papacy-and-my-journey-of-faith.mp3" length="56911740" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>In this episode of Dr. Karlo, Karlo Broussard reflects on his journey from Cajun musician to Catholic apologist while discussing evangelization, the papacy, Protestantism, philosophy, and the intellectual coherence of the Catholic faith.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Divine-Mercy-Interview-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#026 “Invoking the Saints Leads to Abuse and Gospel Violations”—Is this a Reason to Give It Up? - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[In this episode, Karlo Broussard responds to Gavin Ortlund by defending Marian prayer and the Catholic practice of invoking the saints.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/invoking-the-saints-leads-to-abuse-and-gospel-violations-is-this-a-reason-to-give-it-up</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/invoking-the-saints-leads-to-abuse-and-gospel-violations-is-this-a-reason-to-give-it-up</guid>
   <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 14:47:17 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Invoking-the-Saints-Leads-to-Abuse-and-Gospel-Violations.mp3" length="26760337" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>In this episode, Karlo Broussard responds to Gavin Ortlund by defending Marian prayer and the Catholic practice of invoking the saints.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Invoking-the-Saints-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#025 Chance or Design? The Truth Behind Evolution - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[In this episode, Karlo Broussard responds to thinkers like Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, challenging the claim that evolution’s randomness eliminates the need for God by showing that chance actually presupposes an underlying order or design. Drawing on classical philosophy and Thomas Aquinas, I argue that evolutionary processes can fit within divine providence, rather than undermine it.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/chance-or-design-the-truth-behind-evolution</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/chance-or-design-the-truth-behind-evolution</guid>
   <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 20:51:48 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Chance-or-Design-The-Truth-Behind-Evolution_1.mp3" length="23459834" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>In this episode, Karlo Broussard responds to thinkers like Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, challenging the claim that evolution’s randomness eliminates the need for God by showing that chance actually presupposes an underlying order or design. Drawing on classical philosophy and Thomas Aquinas, I argue that evolutionary processes can fit within divine providence, rather than undermine it.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Chance-or-Design-PC_-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#024 The Sight of Men or God? What James Meant by Justification - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Is James 2:24 about being justified before God—or just in the sight of others? In this episode, I break down key Protestant objections and show why James’s teaching on faith and works points to a real, grace-enabled justification before God, not mere human vindication.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/the-sight-of-men-or-god-what-james-meant-by-justification</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/the-sight-of-men-or-god-what-james-meant-by-justification</guid>
   <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:02:05 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/In-the-Sight-of-Men-or-God_What-James-Meant-by-Justification_2.mp3" length="30164280" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Is James 2:24 about being justified before God—or just in the sight of others? In this episode, I break down key Protestant objections and show why James’s teaching on faith and works points to a real, grace-enabled justification before God, not mere human vindication.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/In-the-Sight-of-God-or-Man-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#023 Does the Bible Teach Baptism Saves? - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Dr. Karlo features a crossover conversation unpacking the biblical case for baptism’s role in salvation, responding to common objections and highlighting its connection to forgiveness, new life, and union with Christ.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/does-the-bible-teach-baptism-saves</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/does-the-bible-teach-baptism-saves</guid>
   <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 19:14:40 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Baptism-Now-Saves-You-Interview-with-Mercier.mp3" length="36034192" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Dr. Karlo features a crossover conversation unpacking the biblical case for baptism’s role in salvation, responding to common objections and highlighting its connection to forgiveness, new life, and union with Christ.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Baptism-Now-Saves-You-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#022 Jesus the Miracle Worker—History or Legend? - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Are the Gospel accounts of Jesus’ miracles reliable history—or later legend? In this video, we explore ancient sources, skeptical critics, and historical criteria to uncover whether Jesus’ reputation as a miracle worker stands up to serious scrutiny.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/jesus-the-miracle-worker-history-or-legend</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/jesus-the-miracle-worker-history-or-legend</guid>
   <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 14:25:15 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Jesus-the-Miracle-Worker-History-or-Legend_2.mp3" length="26724665" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Are the Gospel accounts of Jesus’ miracles reliable history—or later legend? In this video, we explore ancient sources, skeptical critics, and historical criteria to uncover whether Jesus’ reputation as a miracle worker stands up to serious scrutiny.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Jesus-Miracle-Worker-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#021 Is the Mass the Same Sacrifice as Calvary? A Response to James White - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Does James White’s appeal to Hebrews 10:14 really disprove the Catholic claim that the Mass is the same sacrifice as Calvary? In this episode, Karlo Broussard breaks down his argument and show how shifting definitions of “perfection” actually undermine his case and reveal a deeper harmony between Scripture and the Catholic understanding of the Mass.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/is-the-mass-the-same-sacrifice-as-calvary-a-response-to-james-white</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/is-the-mass-the-same-sacrifice-as-calvary-a-response-to-james-white</guid>
   <pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 23:18:28 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Is-the-Mass-the-Same-Sacrifice-as-Calvary.mp3" length="36411737" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Does James White’s appeal to Hebrews 10:14 really disprove the Catholic claim that the Mass is the same sacrifice as Calvary? In this episode, Karlo Broussard breaks down his argument and show how shifting definitions of “perfection” actually undermine his case and reveal a deeper harmony between Scripture and the Catholic understanding of the Mass.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Sacrifice-of-the-Mass-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#020 Vain Repetition? The Truth About the Rosary! - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Does the Rosary violate Jesus’ warning against “vain repetition”? Karlo explores how the Rosary, rightly understood, draws us deeper into meditation on the life of Christ.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/vain-repetition-the-truth-about-the-rosary</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/vain-repetition-the-truth-about-the-rosary</guid>
   <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 21:46:20 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/YouTube_Vain-Repetition_The-Truth-About-the-Rosary.mp3" length="28947190" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Does the Rosary violate Jesus’ warning against “vain repetition”? Karlo explores how the Rosary, rightly understood, draws us deeper into meditation on the life of Christ.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Rosary-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#019 “Is Purgatory the ‘Ultimate Insult’ to Jesus’ Death on the Cross?” - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[If Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross is fully sufficient, does purgatory contradict it—or reveal how its power is applied? In this episode, Karlo Broussard breaks down the “ultimate insult” objection and show how Scripture and theology point to purgatory as participation in Christ’s work, not a denial of it.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/is-purgatory-the-ultimate-insult-to-jesus-death-on-the-cross</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/is-purgatory-the-ultimate-insult-to-jesus-death-on-the-cross</guid>
   <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 21:33:22 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Is-Purgatory-the-Ultimate-Insult-to-Jesus-Death-on-the-Cross_1.mp3" length="26532236" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>If Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross is fully sufficient, does purgatory contradict it—or reveal how its power is applied? In this episode, Karlo Broussard breaks down the “ultimate insult” objection and show how Scripture and theology point to purgatory as participation in Christ’s work, not a denial of it.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/PURGATORY-2PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#018 Does the Bible Reject the Use of Philosophy? - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Karlo Broussard explains how Paul the Apostle in 1 Corinthians critiques worldly “wisdom,” not philosophy itself, drawing on Thomas Aquinas to show that reason rightly used can still lead to God.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/does-the-bible-reject-the-use-of-philosophy</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/does-the-bible-reject-the-use-of-philosophy</guid>
   <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 18:04:30 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Does-the-Bible-Reject-the-Use-of-Philosophy_1.mp3" length="24412266" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Karlo Broussard explains how Paul the Apostle in 1 Corinthians critiques worldly “wisdom,” not philosophy itself, drawing on Thomas Aquinas to show that reason rightly used can still lead to God.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Philosophy-and-Bible-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#017 Sacred Tradition—Overstepping Boundaries? - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Does 1 Corinthians 4:6—“Do not go beyond what is written”—undermine the Catholic appeal to Sacred Tradition? In this episode, I show why the context of Paul's writings and the broader New Testament actually point the other way, revealing that apostolic teaching was handed on both in writing and by word of mouth.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/sacred-tradition-overstepping-boundaries</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/sacred-tradition-overstepping-boundaries</guid>
   <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 18:28:10 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Sacred-Tradition.mp3" length="26043748" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Does 1 Corinthians 4:6—“Do not go beyond what is written”—undermine the Catholic appeal to Sacred Tradition? In this episode, I show why the context of Paul&apos;s writings and the broader New Testament actually point the other way, revealing that apostolic teaching was handed on both in writing and by word of mouth.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Sacred-Tradition-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#015 Bald Heads, Big Questions: Baptism, the Canon, and Sola Scriptura - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[In this bonus episode, Dr. Karlo and William discuss Catholic apologetics topics like the biblical canon, sola scriptura, baptismal regeneration, and infant baptism while also highlighting Karlo’s new ministry projects and taking audience questions.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/bald-heads-big-questions-baptism-the-canon-and-sola-scriptura</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/bald-heads-big-questions-baptism-the-canon-and-sola-scriptura</guid>
   <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 19:33:29 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Baptism-Canon-Sola-Scriptura-and-more.mp3" length="46554673" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>In this bonus episode, Dr. Karlo and William discuss Catholic apologetics topics like the biblical canon, sola scriptura, baptismal regeneration, and infant baptism while also highlighting Karlo’s new ministry projects and taking audience questions.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Bald-Heads-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#014 Peter, a Regular Ole “Pillar”? - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Some Protestants argue that Paul’s letter to the Galatians shows Peter was just one leader among many—not the first pope. In this episode, I explain why Galatians 2:6 and 2:9 don’t undermine Peter’s unique role and actually make good sense within the broader biblical case for the papacy.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/peter-a-regular-ole-pillar</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/peter-a-regular-ole-pillar</guid>
   <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 18:12:21 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Youtube_Is-Peter-Just-a-Regular-Ole-Pillar_Take-9_1.mp3" length="26581558" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Some Protestants argue that Paul’s letter to the Galatians shows Peter was just one leader among many—not the first pope. In this episode, I explain why Galatians 2:6 and 2:9 don’t undermine Peter’s unique role and actually make good sense within the broader biblical case for the papacy.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Peter-Regular-Ole-Pillar-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#013 Religion: A Betrayal of the Intellect? - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Is religious belief a betrayal of the intellect because it isn’t scientific or because it’s “faith without evidence”? In this episode, I examine challenges from thinkers like Richard Dawkins, Lawrence Krauss, and Stephen Hawking, and argue that scientism refutes itself and that Christian faith is rooted in evidence—not blind belief.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/religion-a-betrayal-of-the-intellect</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/religion-a-betrayal-of-the-intellect</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 14:32:44 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Religion-A-Betrayal-of-the-Intellect.mp3" length="28979459" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Is religious belief a betrayal of the intellect because it isn’t scientific or because it’s “faith without evidence”? In this episode, I examine challenges from thinkers like Richard Dawkins, Lawrence Krauss, and Stephen Hawking, and argue that scientism refutes itself and that Christian faith is rooted in evidence—not blind belief.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Religion-intellect-etc-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#012 If Jesus Paid it All, Why Do Penance? - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[If Jesus “paid it all” on the Cross, why would Christians need to do penance—especially during Lent? In this episode, we unpack the common objection, walk through St. Thomas Aquinas’s explanation of participation in Christ’s Passion, and look at Colossians 1:24 to show why penance doesn’t undermine the sufficiency of the Cross—but actually flows from it.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/if-jesus-paid-it-all-why-do-penance</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/if-jesus-paid-it-all-why-do-penance</guid>
   <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 21:35:51 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/If-Jesus-Paid-it-All-Why-Penance-PODCAST.mp3" length="28233861" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>If Jesus “paid it all” on the Cross, why would Christians need to do penance—especially during Lent? In this episode, we unpack the common objection, walk through St. Thomas Aquinas’s explanation of participation in Christ’s Passion, and look at Colossians 1:24 to show why penance doesn’t undermine the sufficiency of the Cross—but actually flows from it.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/06-Lent-Penance-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#011 God Talk: Reason, Arguments for God, and the Problem of Evil - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[In this episode of the Dr. Karlo podcast, we explore arguments for God’s existence, the problem of evil, divine simplicity, hell, providence, and the role of miracles in Christian apologetics.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/god-talk-reason-arguments-for-god-and-the-problem-of-evil</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/god-talk-reason-arguments-for-god-and-the-problem-of-evil</guid>
   <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 15:22:36 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/God-Talk_Reason-Arguments-for-God-and-Problem-of-Evil.mp3" length="69510488" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>In this episode of the Dr. Karlo podcast, we explore arguments for God’s existence, the problem of evil, divine simplicity, hell, providence, and the role of miracles in Christian apologetics.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/God-Talk-THUBMNAIL-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#009 Where Catholics Go Wrong on Justification - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Dr. Karlo Broussard discusses where Catholics often misstep when debating justification with Protestants—especially by muddying stages, terms, and the grace–works relationship—and how clearer biblical and Tridentine framing leads to more fruitful dialogue.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/151081</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/151081</guid>
   <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 15:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Where-Catholics-Go-Wrong-on-Justification.mp3" length="59339806" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Dr. Karlo Broussard discusses where Catholics often misstep when debating justification with Protestants—especially by muddying stages, terms, and the grace–works relationship—and how clearer biblical and Tridentine framing leads to more fruitful dialogue.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Where-Catholics-Go-Wrong-with-Justification-PC-Thumbnail-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#008 The Argument for Sola Scriptura that’s Fallacious - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[In this episode, Dr. Karlo critiques a popular Protestant argument for Sola Scriptura, showing that its appeal to biblical inspiration commits a logical fallacy by wrongly assuming that only inspired authorities can be infallible.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/the-argument-for-sola-scriptura-thats-fallacious</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/the-argument-for-sola-scriptura-thats-fallacious</guid>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:10:57 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/PODCAST-The-Argument-for-Sola-Scriptura-That-is-Fallacious.mp3" length="30572207" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>In this episode, Dr. Karlo critiques a popular Protestant argument for Sola Scriptura, showing that its appeal to biblical inspiration commits a logical fallacy by wrongly assuming that only inspired authorities can be infallible.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/05-Argument-for-Sola-Scriptura-Fallacious-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#007 Was I Wrong About the Assurance of Heaven? - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[In this episode, Dr. Karlo Broussard refutes four counterarguments, showing they fail to undermine his interpretation of 1 John 5:13 or support the doctrine of eternal security.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/was-i-wrong-about-the-assurance-of-heaven</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/was-i-wrong-about-the-assurance-of-heaven</guid>
   <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 16:07:33 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Was-I-Wrong-About-the-Assurance-of-Heaven.mp3" length="20749297" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>In this episode, Dr. Karlo Broussard refutes four counterarguments, showing they fail to undermine his interpretation of 1 John 5:13 or support the doctrine of eternal security.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/03-Standalone-Assurance-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#006 Is Religion Just for the Ignorant? The Answer Might Surprise You - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Dr. Karlo Broussard challenges the idea that religion is for the uneducated by showing how data, expertise, and great thinkers reveal faith and reason as allies, not enemies.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/is-religion-just-for-the-ignorant-the-answer-might-surprise-you</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/is-religion-just-for-the-ignorant-the-answer-might-surprise-you</guid>
   <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 13:49:15 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Is-Religion-for-the-Ignorant-PODCAST-AUDIO.mp3" length="24178585" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Dr. Karlo Broussard challenges the idea that religion is for the uneducated by showing how data, expertise, and great thinkers reveal faith and reason as allies, not enemies.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/004-Religion-for-the-ignorant-2-1-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#005 Where Catholics Go Wrong in Critiquing Sola Scriptura - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[In this episode, Dr. Karlo Broussard chats with Adrian Lawson from Sips with Serra about where Catholics go wrong when critiquing Sola Scriptura.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/where-catholics-go-wrong-in-critiquing-sola-scriptura</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/where-catholics-go-wrong-in-critiquing-sola-scriptura</guid>
   <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 16:09:15 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Where-Catholics-Go-Wrong-in-Critiquing-Sola-Scriptura-PODCAST-AUDIO.mp3" length="53251397" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>In this episode, Dr. Karlo Broussard chats with Adrian Lawson from Sips with Serra about where Catholics go wrong when critiquing Sola Scriptura.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/Where-Catholics-Go-Wrong-in-Critiquing-Sola-Scriptura_podcast-thumbnail-1400x1400.jpg"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#004 What John Really Teaches About the Assurance of Heaven - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Karlo Broussard examines 1 John 5:13 and argues that the apostle John teaches confident hope in salvation grounded in persevering faith and love—not an absolute, once-and-for-all assurance of heaven.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/what-john-really-teaches-about-the-assurance-of-heaven</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/what-john-really-teaches-about-the-assurance-of-heaven</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 13:19:23 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/003-What-John-Really-Teaches-About-Assurance-of-Heaven.mp3" length="22159769" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Karlo Broussard examines 1 John 5:13 and argues that the apostle John teaches confident hope in salvation grounded in persevering faith and love—not an absolute, once-and-for-all assurance of heaven.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/003-What-John-Really-Teaches-About-Assurance-2-PC-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#003 They STILL Want Me to Stop Apologetics - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Dr. Karlo Broussard answers critics by explaining why occasional failure or poor practice doesn’t justify giving up apologetics, while emphasizing the need to do it well and charitably.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/they-still-want-me-to-stop-apologetics</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/they-still-want-me-to-stop-apologetics</guid>
   <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 16:05:17 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/They-STILL-Want-Me-to-Stop-Apologetics.mp3" length="22045526" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Dr. Karlo Broussard answers critics by explaining why occasional failure or poor practice doesn’t justify giving up apologetics, while emphasizing the need to do it well and charitably.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/01-Standalone-Still-Ditch-Apologetics-v2-PODCAST-THUMBNAIL-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#002 Thou Shalt Not Kill the Innocent? Intuition Isn&#8217;t Sufficient Anymore - Karlo Broussard]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Dr. Karlo defends the claim that abortion is immoral by arguing that deliberately killing an innocent human being violates objective moral principles.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/thou-shalt-not-kill-the-innocent-intuition-isnt-sufficient-anymore</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/thou-shalt-not-kill-the-innocent-intuition-isnt-sufficient-anymore</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 18:01:22 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/002-Thou-Shalt-Not-Kill-the-Innocent_Intuition-Isnt-Sufficient-Anymore-PODCAST-AUDIO.mp3" length="50049047" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Dr. Karlo defends the claim that abortion is immoral by arguing that deliberately killing an innocent human being violates objective moral principles.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/002-Thou-Shalt-Not-Kill-the-Innocent_Intuition-Isnt-Sufficient-Anymore-PODCAST-THUMBNAIL-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[#001 Should We Ditch Apologetics?]]></title>
   <description><![CDATA[Dr. Karlo argues that apologetics should not be abandoned, because reasoned arguments—alongside love and prayer—remain essential for defending the faith, leading people to truth, and helping others share fully in the spiritual goods of the Catholic Church.]]></description>
   <link>https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/should-we-ditch-apologetics</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.catholic.com/audio/drk/should-we-ditch-apologetics</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:44:13 GMT</pubDate>
   <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/001-Should-We-Ditch-Apologetics-Podcast-Audio.mp3" length="40067024" type="audio/mpeg"/>
   <psc:chapters version="1.2" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters">
   </psc:chapters>
   <itunes:summary>Dr. Karlo argues that apologetics should not be abandoned, because reasoned arguments—alongside love and prayer—remain essential for defending the faith, leading people to truth, and helping others share fully in the spiritual goods of the Catholic Church.</itunes:summary>
   <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
   <itunes:image href="https://cdn.catholic.com/wp-content/uploads/001-Should-We-Ditch-Apologetics-PODCAST-Thumbnail-1400x1400.png"/>
  </item>
 </channel>
</rss>