ON THE FORUMS


"; document.write(HotScript); //var TableBegin=""; //document.write(TableBegin); //-->

 View Forums

 FREE Membership

 FREE Newsletter

OUR SPONSORS




Please support our sponsors

CATHOLIC QUOTES


 Encyclopedia RSS

 Catholic Encyclopedia

SPECIAL OFFERS


Catholic Answers Live - Special Offers


S  i  d  e  b  a  r



The Vatican and the Welfare State




This Rock
Volume 17, Number 4
  April 2006  

 Reasons for Hope
By Cherie Peacock
 Letters
 Our Quiet Pope
By Russell Shaw
 For Further Reading
 What Do You See at Mass?
By Anthony E. Clark
 The Saints Speak
 The Pope Speaks
 Babies Deserve Better
By Jameson and Jennifer Taylor
 Infertility Terms You Need to Know
 Where to Turn for Help
 Further Reading
 Why Don't Catholics Go Straight to Jesus?
By Robert G. Schroeder
 Confession in the Early Church
 Further Reading
 Catholic Social Responsibility: Who Should Do What?
By Gregory Beabout
 The Vatican and the Welfare State
 The Foundations of the Tradition
 The EU: More Competent Than Thou
 Damascus Road
From Pastor to Parishioner: My Love for Christ Led Me Home
By Drake McCalister
 By the Book
Homosexuality
By Jim Blackburn
 Truth Be Told
Reform Came before the Reformation
By Matthew E. Bunson
 Up a Notch
Apologetics and Canon Law
By Pete Vere, JCL
 Quick Questions
 Last Writes
By Karl Keating

  Subscribe
  Permissions

John Paul II, Centesimus Annus
In this 1991 encyclical, Pope John Paul II wrote, "In recent years the range of [government] intervention has vastly expanded to the point of creating a new type of state, the so-called welfare state. This has happened in some countries in order to respond better to many needs and demands, by remedying forms of poverty and deprivation unworthy of the human person. However, excesses and abuses, especially in recent years, have provoked very harsh criticisms of the welfare state, dubbed the ‘social assistance state.’ Malfunctions and defects in the social assistance state are the result of an inadequate understanding of the tasks proper to the state. Here again the principle of subsidiarity must be respected: A community of a higher order should not interfere in the internal life of a community of a lower order, depriving the latter of its functions, but rather should support it in case of need and help to coordinate its activity with the activities of the rest of society, always with a view to the common good.

"By intervening directly and depriving society of its responsibility, the social assistance state leads to a loss of human energies and an inordinate increase of public agencies, which are dominated more by bureaucratic ways of thinking than by concern for serving their clients and are accompanied by an enormous increase in spending. In fact, it would appear that needs are best understood and satisfied by people who are closest to them and who act as neighbors to those in need. It should be added that certain kinds of demands often call for a response that is not simply material but is capable of perceiving the deeper human need. One thinks of the condition of refugees, immigrants, the elderly, the sick, and all those in circumstances that call for assistance, such as drug abusers: All these people can be helped effectively only by those who offer them genuine fraternal support, in addition to the necessary care" (CA 48).

Benedict XVI, Deus Caritas Est
In his first encyclical, Pope Benedict XVI wrote, "We do not need a state that regulates and controls everything but a state that, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, generously acknowledges and supports initiatives arising from the different social forces and combines spontaneity with closeness to those in need. The Church is one of those living forces: It is alive with the love enkindled by the Spirit of Christ. This love does not simply offer people material help but refreshment and care for their souls, something that often is even more necessary than material support. In the end, the claim that just social structures would make works of charity superfluous masks a materialist conception of man: the mistaken notion that man can live "by bread alone" (Matt. 4:4; cf. Deut. 8:3)—a conviction that demeans man and ultimately disregards all that is specifically human" (DCE 28).



This Rock -- Free Offer

[BACK][TOP]

Home | Seminars | Library | Radio | Magazines | Catalogue | Support | Chastity | Search