|
U p F r o n t
By Karl Keating

|

This Rock
Volume 5, Number 5
May 1994
|
|

|
Brazilian bishop Bonaventura Kloppenburg was
quoted a few years ago as saying, "I was told the Second Vatican
Council had put an end to apologetics. I obeyed and stopped fighting."
The results, he opined, have been disastrous, "and all we can
do now is to go back to the apologetic, defensive method and inevitable
polemics." I was alternately dismayed, pleased, and dismayed
again by the bishop's remarks.
I was dismayed that a bishop could think that Vatican
II "had put an end to apologetics." Nowhere does such a
sentiment exist in the documents of the Council; it appears only on
the tongues of those who still talk about "the spirit of Vatican
II," as though that were something different from the Council
itself.
Then I was pleased to see that Bishop Kloppenburg realized
that an absence of apologetics results in an absence of faith. After
all, the faith is not passed on by what I have termed the eighth sacrament,
Holy Osmosis.
Dismay returned when I saw that Bishop Kloppenburg
equated apologetics with a "defensive method" and "inevitable
polemics." I know apologetics sometimes is nothing more than
the first and might degenerate into the second--but not necessarily.
I'm interested not just in defending the faith, but
in going on the offensive to spread the faith joyfully. Besides, there's
nothing "inevitable" about "polemics" (in the
sense of nasty-tongued controversy). There will be controversy, but
it can be positive, stimulating, and faith-building.
|