ON THE FORUMS


"; document.write(HotScript); //var TableBegin=""; //document.write(TableBegin); //-->

 View Forums

 FREE Membership

 FREE Newsletter

OUR SPONSORS




Please support our sponsors

CATHOLIC QUOTES


 Encyclopedia RSS

 Catholic Encyclopedia

SPECIAL OFFERS


Catholic Answers Live - Special Offers


U  p    F  r  o  n  t



By Karl Keating



This Rock
Volume 5, Number 5
  May 1994  

 Up Front
By Karl Keating
 Letters
 Dragnet
 OUR SILENT HERESY
By BRIAN HARRISON, O.S.
 Sidebar
Second Ecumenical Council of Nicaea (787)
 OUR SHOP-AROUND NEIGHBORS
By JAMES J. MORAN
 Sidebar
He Increases and She Decreases
By Mark P. Shea
 Between the Lines
No, No Mademoiselle!
By Karl Keating
 BBS Transcript
Cat-holic Dog-ma
 Classic Apologetics
The Catholic Evidence Guild: Part II
By Frank Sheed
 New Testament Guide
Acts
By Antonio Fuentes
 Fathers Know Best
Intercession of the Saints
 Heresy of the Month
Ebionism
By James Akin
 Verse by Verse
Original Sin
 Quick Questions

  Subscribe
  Permissions

Brazilian bishop Bonaventura Kloppenburg was quoted a few years ago as saying, "I was told the Second Vatican Council had put an end to apologetics. I obeyed and stopped fighting." The results, he opined, have been disastrous, "and all we can do now is to go back to the apologetic, defensive method and inevitable polemics." I was alternately dismayed, pleased, and dismayed again by the bishop's remarks.

I was dismayed that a bishop could think that Vatican II "had put an end to apologetics." Nowhere does such a sentiment exist in the documents of the Council; it appears only on the tongues of those who still talk about "the spirit of Vatican II," as though that were something different from the Council itself.

Then I was pleased to see that Bishop Kloppenburg realized that an absence of apologetics results in an absence of faith. After all, the faith is not passed on by what I have termed the eighth sacrament, Holy Osmosis.

Dismay returned when I saw that Bishop Kloppenburg equated apologetics with a "defensive method" and "inevitable polemics." I know apologetics sometimes is nothing more than the first and might degenerate into the second--but not necessarily.

I'm interested not just in defending the faith, but in going on the offensive to spread the faith joyfully. Besides, there's nothing "inevitable" about "polemics" (in the sense of nasty-tongued controversy). There will be controversy, but it can be positive, stimulating, and faith-building.


This Rock -- Free Offer

[BACK][TOP]

Home | Seminars | Library | Radio | This Rock Magazine | Shop | Donate | Chastity | Search