CATHOLIC Q & A


LATEST QUESTION

Popular Subjects

Top 20 Questions

Ask A Question

ON THE FORUMS


"; document.write(HotScript); //var TableBegin=""; //document.write(TableBegin); //-->

 View Forums

 FREE Membership

 FREE Newsletter

OUR SPONSORS




Please support our sponsors

SPECIAL OFFERS


Catholic Answers Live - Special Offers


KARL KEATING'S E-LETTER

April 6, 2004
 Index
 Prior issue     Next issue
 Sign up

TOPICS:

I GET A LETTER FROM THE POPE



Dear Friend of Catholic Answers:

It isn't everyday that one receives a private letter from a pope. In fact, this is the first time I have received such a letter.

I once had the opportunity, nearly a decade ago, to be introduced to John Paul II after attending a papal Mass in the Vatican's Apostolic Palace. I handed him a copy of "Catholicism and Fundamentalism," and he made a gracious remark about it. He gave me the customary papal rosary, which I passed along to my wife. But never did I expect to receive a private letter from a pope. I got one last month.

It was postmarked Springdale, Washington, not Vatican City, because the letter was not from Pope John Paul II but from Pope Pius XIII, known before his election as Fr. Lucian Pulvermacher, OFM Cap.

This lesser-known pope wrote, "You are old enough to know that bogus Council Vatican II took place between 1962 and 1965. The bogus popes (John XXIII and Paul VI) formed a new false Protestant religion. They made a new liturgy with seven new invalid sacraments. They made a new false canon law in 1983. Finally, they made a heretical 'Catechism of the Catholic Church.'"

(Actually, it was John Paul II who oversaw the production of the revised code of canon law and of the new catechism, but you get the drift.)

THE BOGUS CHURCH DOES NOT HAVE ANY CATHOLIC ANSWERS

"Karl, please look into the problem that you have. You just cannot get God's help through being in the Novus Ordo bogus Church of John Paul II. The people who think they are Catholics must leave the bogus Novus Ordo and join Us in the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church. ...

"Catholic Answers should be guided by the true Catholic Church. Why rocket off from the quicksand base of the Novus Ordo? ... If you continue in the Novus Ordo you do not have Catholic answers. You have bogus Council Vatican II Novus Ordo answers. We alone have the answers you are required by God to propagate."

Pius XIII referred me to his web site:
www.truecatholic.org

There you can learn how it came to be that the Catholic Church is headquartered in a small town in the Pacific Northwest. You can learn other things, too, including Pius XIII's background.

Earl Pulvermacher was born in 1918. He was ordained a priest in the Capuchin order in 1946 and was given the religious name of Lucian. At first he was posted to a parish in Milwaukee, but in 1948 he was sent to Japan, where he served in the Ryukyu Islands and on Okinawa until 1970.

For the next six years he served as a missionary in Australia. And then he went "cold turkey," as he puts it. "He never took the step of [getting a] 'leave of absence,' and that was the right way to do it. He never even said good-bye to the Novus Ordo Church and Capuchin Order."

He returned to the U.S. and joined up with some Traditionalist priests, but he "learned, to his surprise and dismay, that they were not truly Catholic, so in August of 1976, he left the Traditionalist movement and since that time has been all alone as a priest."

The web site does not make clear why the man who would become Pius XIII so abruptly abandoned what he terms the "Novus Ordo." It does say that he was upset with the poor catechetical materials used in parishes in Australia and that his provincial reprimanded him for preaching on hell. It also says that he had what apparently was a turning-point conversation with a priest who helped him understand "the mess around us."

After that conversation Lucian Pulvermacher was gone from Australia and gone from the Capuchin order. He lasted only eight months in the Traditionalist movement, finding even it too accommodating to the "Novus Ordo." He ended up entirely on his own, and he came to understand that there had been no valid pope since Pius XII died in 1958.

THE TRUE CHURCH NEEDED A HEAD

By 1998 the remnant Church had wandered in the ecclesiastical wilderness for forty years, and it was time for a new pope to be elected. Pulvermacher came across a German priest (otherwise unnamed) "who at the time was thought to be papabile." He seemed to be a man acceptable to the few real Catholics left in the world, but then the German backed away.

That left Pulvermacher without a candidate for pope--but not for long. He had been planning a conclave for three years. He even had a methodology. Since all of the cardinals named by Pius XII and earlier popes were dead, there no longer were cardinal-electors. No matter. In times of crisis God permits extraordinary arrangements.

"Natural law allows for Catholics, clergy and laymen, to be the electorate to vote for the pope," explains the web site. "This is because the Church as a perfect society must have the means to restore its visible head, the pope."

First, the electors had to be verified as true Catholics. This was accomplished by having them sign affidavits attesting to such things as their rejection of Vatican II and of the pseudo-popes who followed Pius XII. The electors consisted of both men and women. Since they were spread around the world, it was not convenient for them to gather in one place for the conclave, so they voted by telephone.

The first ballot was tallied and verified on October 24, 1998, and Lucian Pulvermacher himself was elected pope. He took the name Pius XIII, to indicate immediate succession to the last real pope.

As one of his early acts he named cardinals. "In order to protect the College of Cardinals from depletion by forces and events known only to God," Pius XIII named two men publicly as cardinals and another six secretly. These appointments were of laymen.

He ordained one of the cardinals, Gordon Bateman, a priest and then consecrated him a bishop in June 1999. This was accomplished even though the Pope himself was only a priest. On the Fourth of July, Bateman consecrated Pius XIII, making the Pope finally a bishop. (The web site gives a not-very-persuasive explanation of how a mere priest was able to consecrate a bishop.)

A "PETIT EGLISE"

Stalin, referring to Pius XII, is quoted as asking, "How many divisions has the Pope?" You may ask, how many followers has Pius XIII?

His web site gives an evasive answer: "Certainly the entire body of the electorate [those who participated in the conclave] is subject to Pope Pius XIII. In addition, as news gets out to the world, more laity and clergy are sending their obedience to the pope. At this time we have no specific numbers." Well, probably they do, but the numbers must be so small as to be embarrassing.

After all, Lucian Pulvermacher is not the only claimant to the papal throne. There are others scattered throughout the world.

"Pope Michael I" lives in Delia, Kansas, above his parents' store, and there are at least two men who style themselves "Pope Gregory XVII," one in Canada and one in Spain. Every few years we hear of another new pope. It may be that never have so many in so many places believed themselves to have been elected to the See of Peter.

Pius XIII's web site includes links to several short video clips of the Springdale pope. He is nearly 86 and looks like a kindly man: medium height, portly, his voice tentative, as though he is not comfortable speaking before a camera. Still photographs show him in what may be the back yard of his residence, dressed in papal white and standing near a chicken-wire fence.

You wonder what happened to the Fr. Pulvermacher of three decades ago. What made him leave not just Australia and the Capuchins but the real Catholic Church? What propelled him, in just a few months, clear past the Traditionalist movement and into a church of his own making?

Was it one great disappoint he suffered, or was it a serious of small injustices that finally built to a crescendo? Was it that some long-standing character defect surfaced, perhaps a species of pride that convinced him that God had singled him out for the highest of all offices?

What we can say is that Lucian Pulvermacher now lives simply in rural Washington, and he lives a delusion. He has a handful of devoted followers, some of whom, in all likelihood, still will be his followers when he dies, which cannot be many years off.

We can speculate that two of those survivors may conclude that they are called by God to become the Supreme Pastor, and that means the church of Pius XIII will undergo fission. Just as there are two Gregory XVIIs, so there will be two Pius XIVs, each with his own church.

It is easy to make fun of all this, but it is good to keep in mind that the players in these dramas are not play acting. They think they are acting out real life. They think they lead the remnant Church.

What they really have done is to succumb to despair. Their despair prompts them not to do away with themselves (which is what despair so often leads people to do) but to elevate themselves to the loftiest of stations, where they imagine they are withstanding forces that unsleepingly work against the true Church of Christ.

You have to grant them a bit of a smile, even as you shake your head in bewilderment.

Until next time,
Karl
 Index
 Prior issue     Next issue
 Sign up


p.s., Montreal! Quebec City! Halifax! Cairo! (Well, not Cairo.)

Join Jimmy Akin, Rosalind Moss, Tim Staples, Thomas Howard, Bishop Colin Campbell, and me for a week of beautiful fall scenery and invigorating large- and small-group events, including daily Mass, rosaries, and fun on-shore excursions.

The 2004 Catholic Answers apologetics cruise runs from October 2-9, starting in Montreal and ending in Boston.

For more information, go to:
http://catholicanswerscruise.com


This Rock -- Free Offer

[BACK][TOP]

Home | Seminars | Library | Radio | This Rock Magazine | Shop | Donate | Chastity | Search