Mary and Child from "Song of the Angels" by Bouguereau
 

KARL'S E-LETTERS

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

Sign Up

Permissions

OUR SPONSORS


Sponsor: CatholicSingles.Com - The Site for Catholic Singles on the Web
Sponsor: EpiphanyFund.com - quality investment services thru faithful stewardship

Sponsor: PatrickMadrid.com

Please support our sponsors

LIBRARY

God & Christ

Scripture & Tradition

Church & Papacy

Mary & the Saints

Faith & Science

Morality & Ethics

Sacraments

Salvation

Last things

Non-Catholic groups

Anti-Catholicism

Practical Apologetics

Fathers Know Best

Permissions

THIS ROCK

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

1990

Subscribe

Permissions

BOOKLETS

PillarofFire

Pure Love

12WaystoEvangelize

Permissions

SPECIAL OFFERS


Catholic Answers Live - Special Offers


KARL KEATING'S E-LETTER

November 25, 2003
 Index
 Prior issue     Next issue
 Sign up
TOPICS:

BITTERNESS AT NCR
PRIESTLESS PARISHES?



Dear Friend of Catholic Answers:

Over the last two decades the number of priests serving the Catholic Church in America has declined by about a fifth, even as the total number of Catholics has grown. In contrast, the number of clergy serving the Episcopal Church has increased by more than a quarter, even as that body has lost membership.

The shortage of Catholic priests will be resolved over time. As I said in a previous E-Letter, there is no shortage of vocations. The problem is that many priestly vocations are not fostered at the diocesan level. In many places, men with authentic vocations and orthodox beliefs are obstructed from moving toward ordination. This is an eminently solvable problem.

The situation in the Episcopal Church is different. Now that a practicing homosexual has been ordained as a bishop, even more Episcopalians will leave. The declining church will decline even faster. But there likely will be a continuing increase in the number of Episcopal clergy, leading, in theory, to the amusing situation of a church in which there are more chiefs than Indians.

A CRABBED ATTITUDE

Tim Unsworth, writing for the "National Catholic Reporter," packed a lot of complaints into his most recent column. It's clear he doesn't like the church he professes to be a member of.

His first complaint was that his friends David and Margaret found it too inconvenient to be married in the Catholic Church. Margaret is Catholic, and David is Jewish and previously married. He didn't want to go through the annulment process, so he and Margaret got married in a Buddhist ceremony.

No problem, said Unsworth. His friends are "two good people of deep faith and exquisite taste." Deep faith in what? Unsworth doesn't say, but apparently Margaret's faith isn't deep enough to restrain her from attempting marriage outside the Church. But no matter. During the ceremony David's daughter sang Schubert's "Ave Maria" in Latin, which apparently made up for any defects in matter or form.

After praising Buddhism's "rich liturgy," Unsworth turns to his next complaint. He despises the new liturgical regulations issued by Rome:

"In a statement frozen solid by the absence of doubt and larded with disdain and dismissal, the Vatican instructed bishops to have their priests lambaste the faithful, pot-roast Catholics in the pews to bow before receiving Communion, to keep their nonordained feet out of the sanctuary, to nail their squirming kids to the pews, and a pile of other minutiae that is supposed to increase respect for the central sacrament."

The purple prose obscures commonsensical regulations, not one of which is new. What is Unsworth's problem? A partial explanation is given in a later paragraph, when he writes about a priest he used to know:

"Even as an old man, he used to walk up and down the aisle before Sunday Mass. He played the jester or the clown. He chatted with the children and asked the elderly about their lumbago or fallen arches. He created a community of friends. He asked about the recent death of a spouse. Unlike the new regulations that render them comatose, he warmed up the crowd."

The last phrase holds the key. To Unsworth, Massgoers are a "crowd" that needs to be "warmed up." They are not participants in a divine drama, not present at the sacred and awe-filled representation of Calvary. No, they are an audience come to be entertained. The Mass is the main act (did his priest friend, as some have done, dress up as a clown for the Liturgy of the Eucharist?), but the main act needs a warm-up act, and so Father gladhandingly walked the aisle before Mass.

Is it good for a priest to chat with children, to ask the elderly about their lumbago, and to "create a community of friends"? Sure, but those can be done outside of Mass. There is a time and place for everything, and Mass isn't the place to play entertainer or schmoozer.

The priest Unsworth mentions is dead. Dead too, apparently, was his understanding of what the Mass is. Granted, there still is a constituency for Mass-as-entertainment, but it is a declining and aging constituency. Priests who cater to it are aging too.

Whenever I hear of an liturgy led by a showman-priest, I know with almost complete certainty that the priest is older than I am. He was ordained in the sixties, maybe in the seventies, and he is caught in a time warp of his own making.

Writing of himself and his wife, Unsworth says, "Jean and I now live a stripped-down religious life. We are there on Sundays. ... We try to see the plus side of negative things, but lately, we've ceased to care about the future of the church, only about the people in it." Another telling remark.

What bitterness Unsworth unleashes in his weekly column! Everything seems to be going wrong; the high hopes of half a lifetime ago are fading. There is no real prospect that the Church will be refashioned as he once thought it would be.

Tim Unsworth has lived his three score and ten, and his old age is proving more sour than he ever could have imagined. The biographical squib at the end of his column says that he "writes from Chicago, where he awaits eternal fire." The sad thing is that the squib may not have been meant as a joke.

PRIESTLESS PARISHES? NOT REALLY SO MANY

Those lobbying for married or female priests keep saying that unless their recommendations are taken up, lots of parishes will have no priests. Just look, they say--that already is the case. Is it really? Statistics from the 2003 edition of "The Official Catholic Directory" indicate otherwise.

There are 19,055 parishes in the U.S., and 16,014 of them have resident pastors. Another 2,516 are overseen by non-resident priests. But almost all of these parishes are rural or mission churches with small congregations. They never have had resident pastors, not even in the heyday of vocations in the 1960s. The priests who celebrate Mass in such parishes live down the road in the area's main parish.

Very few parishes are headed by people who are not priests. Permanent deacons run 134 parishes, brothers run 17, and sisters run 229. Lay men or women run another 133. And 12 parishes are overseen by an outside team of priests.

This means that out of more than 19,000 parishes, barely 500 are not led by priests. Granted, we have a shortage of priestly ordinations, but we are not yet where some people claim we are, only a few steps shy of leaving most Catholics priestless.

Until next time,
Karl
 Index
 Prior issue     Next issue
 Sign up

This Rock -- Free Offer

[BACK][TOP]

Home | Seminars | Library | Radio | Magazines | Catalogue | Support | Chastity | Search