Mary and Child from "Song of the Angels" by Bouguereau
 

KARL'S E-LETTERS

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

Sign Up

Permissions

OUR SPONSORS


Sponsor: CatholicSingles.Com - The Site for Catholic Singles on the Web
Sponsor: EpiphanyFund.com - quality investment services thru faithful stewardship

Sponsor: PatrickMadrid.com

Please support our sponsors

LIBRARY

God & Christ

Scripture & Tradition

Church & Papacy

Mary & the Saints

Faith & Science

Morality & Ethics

Sacraments

Salvation

Last things

Non-Catholic groups

Anti-Catholicism

Practical Apologetics

Fathers Know Best

Permissions

THIS ROCK

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

1990

Subscribe

Permissions

BOOKLETS

PillarofFire

Pure Love

12WaystoEvangelize

Permissions

SPECIAL OFFERS


Catholic Answers Live - Special Offers


KARL KEATING'S E-LETTER

November 18, 2003
 Index
 Prior issue     Next issue
 Sign up
TOPICS:

READER'S ROUNDTABLE



Dear Friend of Catholic Answers:

Saturday night, at my wife's instigation, we attended the Simon and Garfunkel concert in San Diego. (Somewhere, across the hall, were "This Rock" editor Tim Ryland and his wife.) For most in the audience, it was an exercise in nostalgia, though there were some younger attendees who could not have had any recollection of a duo that broke up three decades ago.

When the singers' images were projected on the large screens, I thought to myself, "Good Lord, they're old!" Simon and Garfunkel are both 62. Even older are the Everly Brothers, who gave S&G a break by coming on stage to sing several of their songs, which were recorded in the late fifties.

And then I remembered that I, now in my second half-century, am not so many years behind these guys. When I was a teenager, they seemed "mature" if not quite "old." Today they seem like contemporaries. Such is life.

ON THE SAN DIEGO FIRES

Fr. Mario Elias, a priest in National City (which is just to the south of San Diego) said that the October 28 E-Letter "gives a realistic and deeper perspective of the acts of nature and acts of God and their effects on the human person. I like most the two last paragraphs, giving hope to those in painful situations."

Bernadette Powers said, "How beautifully you described the desecration by fire of your beautiful area. I had no idea of what it was like up close and personal. That was one of your best E-Letters."

Susan Pfaff was equally kind: "Your E-Letter was so beautifully put, it brought tears to my eyes. Thanks for putting things in perspective."

Michele Tamurian wrote from Syracuse, New York: "I teach in a Catholic school and we, along with 311 children, are praying each and every day during our morning prayers for all of you there." Thanks, I'm sure the prayers helped.

Michael Brunker was in the path of the fire. "We live near the Mission Trails area and were evacuated on Sunday night. Never knew Karl lived in the area. I would like to meet him some day." Well, come by the office some time, Mr. Brunker!

Lastly, from my friend Leon Suprenant, president of Catholics United for the Faith: "Thanks for this message, Karl. Our thoughts and prayers are with you, the Catholic Answers staff, and all those affected by the blaze."

SYNOD CYNICISM

In the November 4 E-Letter I recounted the uselessness of the synod put on by the Diocese of San Diego in 1975 and noted that the Diocese of Rockville Center has a synod in the works now. I wondered whether the folks there would end up satisfied with the process or, as I was, frustrated. That E-Letter got a lot of response.

Chris Dobrowolski said, "Great e-letter. I expect you to take some heat for this, but so be it."

Not much heat but some. Here is a comment by a priest from Rockville Center. He was replying to a parishioner who shared with him my E-Letter:

"I sincerely don't think that Karl has the slightest idea of the synod process. [Our parish] held three listening sessions; about 100 people attended the sessions. All topics are allowed to be surfaced, even those that don't have any hope of moving ahead at the present time. ... The Spirit moves in very strange ways; perhaps Karl has forgotten that truth of our faith."

Inasmuch as I participated in a synod and have visited the web site that explains the Rockville Center synod, I think I have a good idea of the procedures. In the E-Letter I questioned the prudence of letting people "vent" about "all topics." This leads to frustration for some of them, since what they want (women priests, for example) never will come to pass.

The priest made no attempt to address any of my points. The best he could do was to throw out a few ad hominem remarks. (But wait a second! Maybe I really have forgotten that the Spirit moves in strange ways. Let me check my current list of beliefs ...)

The priest's comments exemplify the clericalist attitude that, in part, is behind the continuing scandals in the Church in America. It used to be said that clericalism was rampant before Vatican II and that the Council fixed the problem. Hardly. As most people on the outside of the rectory door realize, clericalism is worse today than it was forty or fifty years ago.

Now let's return to comments from folks in the pews:

Erik Dunleavy said, "I was disturbed about the idea of the synod because I feel the bishops and the priests are the leaders, not the laity. Then I thought, well, if they want my ideas, I will give them. Following their suggestion I went to the web site and promptly found that the result was preordained. Perhaps I should have done what you did and gone anyway, but I didn't read your E-Letter until after the event. Serves me right, I should read my e-mail more promptly."

Stephen Moosbrugger is not a happy camper either: "I have experienced diocesan bureaucrats first hand, and they all seem to me to be professionally trained, based on their ability to stifle any divergences to their agenda. Keep up the terrific work, Karl, we love you here in Minnesota!"

Writing about the Diocese of St. Petersburg's program that trains "pastoral ministers," one person (whose name I am withholding) said, "At the theology instruction, the instructor--a priest--repeated three times in a row that, unlike Thomas Aquinas, we cannot prove God's existence by referring to the order in nature because, he said, science has shown that there is no order in the universe! Since I have lived and breathed science all my life, I objected. He smugly replied: 'Then what about Einstein's Theory of Relativism?'"

What a hoot! It's the Theory of Relativity, Father, not the Theory of Relativism, and it has nothing to do with whether we can infer the existence of God from observing order in the universe.

>From a reader in San Jose, commenting on a synod report: "What a waste of time for a document that produces nothing. In the end more money is extracted from the parishes, and the diocese is still run by feminists."

Bonnie Byrne of Newport, Washington, wrote, "I can't help but think that the Church would be better served by dumping all of these endless committees and spending that time and energy in prayer and fasting. Pretty old-fashioned, I know. But many of the Church's great reformers only began their reform after much prayer and personal mortification. They began by reforming themselves and then started on their own communities."

Two years ago Allen T. Ward went to Rockville Center to attend a friend's ordination as deacon. "It was more of a circus than an ordination. I should have known better as my wife's cousin has been a deacon there for about ten years. I would discuss this further but I just went to confession. The year I left the diocese of about 1.2 million Catholics there were zero ordinations. That is zero as in none, zip, zilch, and nada! I would much rather talk about backpacking."

So would I, Mr. Ward--which reminds me, I should start planning for another group backpacking trip. So far, my thoughts turn to the Grand Canyon in March (cool at the top but warm at the river) and the Sierra Nevada in August. I'm open to comments from readers, but please don't suggest places with black flies, humidity, or no real elevation change (sorry, Floridians!).

Until next time,
Karl
 Index
 Prior issue     Next issue
 Sign up

This Rock -- Free Offer

[BACK][TOP]

Home | Seminars | Library | Radio | Magazines | Catalogue | Support | Chastity | Search