"I Wasn't Fed as a Catholic!"

May 9, 2013 | 3 comments

I was never fed in the Catholic Church.

How many times have you heard a former Catholic say this? When I was an Evangelical Christian it was probably the most common response I heard from Catholics when asked why they had left the Church. The sad truth is that most of these lapsed Catholics were never properly catechized, so they became easy targets for Protestants who were only too eager to help them abandon the sacraments and join a church that "feeds you God's Word, the Bible."

These Catholics had absolutely no idea that the Eucharist they had been receiving for years was truly the body and blood, soul and divinity, of our Lord Jesus Christ. They had no idea that the "real meat for the soul" was not good preaching, or praise and worship, but Jesus Christ in the Eucharist, the true "bread of life." Because if they had truly understood and believed the Church's teaching on the Eucharist, that it's not a symbol, but is Christ himself—body, blood, soul, and divinity, under the appearance of bread and wine—they would not had become such easy pickings for Protestant evangelists, or for the secular world for that matter. Who could leave the Church knowing that this precious Bread of Life that we receive at each Mass nourishes us with the love that redeems us, Jesus Christ himself? I say it would be impossible!

That was in the1970s. Fast forward to 2013. I think it's safe to say things have not changed too much on the catechetical front. Catholics are still leaving the Church in droves and the average pew Catholics continue to be poorly catechized. For many in the pew, receiving Communion every Sunday is viewed as perfunctory and meaningless. Vatican official Archbishop Nicola Eterovic acknowledges this problem when he says:

The major challenge are the Christians, especially those who were baptized, but not sufficiently catechized.

So, what to do? First, be not afraid! I can't tell you how many calls and emails I receive from Catholics who are afraid of their own priest. Granted, the priest in question is usually less-than-orthodox, but no matter, he is their shepherd; if approached in a respectful and charitable manner, the intimidation factor will decrease, and he just might hear you. When I asked one recent caller why she was so afraid to approach her priest about a serious liturgical abuse concerning the Eucharist, her answer was simply "I'm afraid he won’t talk to me again." Some gentle encouragement moved her in the right direction and she ended up speaking with the priest. It may help to remember Psalm 56:11:

In God have I put my trust, I will not be afraid; what can man do unto me?

Another caller was upset when she discovered her son's Catholic elementary school teacher was discussing homosexual behavior in his history class. Up until that moment, this young boy didn't know anything about the homosexual lifestyle. This boy went home upset at what he heard. Clearly his innocence had been violated. Since she had already spoken with the teacher about other issues, I recommended she speak with the principal about this last offense. Her answer was, "He knows but he doesn't see it as a real problem." I encouraged her to contact a professional who would see it as a real problem and would help her resolve the issue. In that situation, the words of Pope Paul VI come to mind:

It would be useful if every Christian and every evangelizer were to pray about the following thought: men can gain salvation also in other ways, by God's mercy, even though we do not preach the Gospel to them; but as for us, can we gain salvation if through negligence or fear or shame—what St. Paul called "blushing for the Gospel"—or as a result of false ideas we fail to preach it?

Second, get involved in your parish. Parishes are places where a person receives instruction on searching for the truth, where faith is nourished and strengthened and where the Christian message and God's plan for humanity and the world is communicated. Look for ways to strengthen catechesis in the parish. Involvement in RCIA or CCD can do so much good. Many RCIA programs churn out poorly catechized Catholics, who, after they're received into the Church or confirmed, they still see no evidence or insufficient evidence for the Catholic faith. Nor do they have a clear understanding about what is happening on the altar at Mass when the words of consecration are pronounced. It's not long before receiving Holy Communion every Sunday is viewed as perfunctory and meaningless. The next step is out the door, unlikely to return.

John's Gospel famously begins:

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God (John 1:).

If anyone tells you that he was never fed with the Word of God when he was Catholic, show him this verse and gently explain that he was fed as a Catholic—with Scripture, yes, but first and foremost with Christ himself, the Word of God incarnate, in the Eucharist.

Peggy Frye is a staff apologist at Catholic Answers.
Catechism of the Catholic Church, Pocket Edition
The official Catechism of the Catholic Church, Pocket Edition, clearly spells out the Church's beliefs on: - Love and marriage - Children - God, creation, humanity, life, death, and the afterlife - Mary, the Church, the saints, and the sacraments - And much, much more

Comments by Catholic.com Members

#1  Perry White - Thomson, Georgia

Dear Peggy, Maybe you can explain how Christ in his body extended a piece of bread and said "Do this in remembrance of me". Was it his body he was offering? Since his body was right there it could be confusing. Perhaps you fail to understand that Christ did not institute a magical moment where a cracker is changed into God, but instead a time where we use symbols to remember His sacrifice. It is funny that when He says this is my body Catholics see a cracker turned to flesh, but when the Bible says Mary had brothers, Catholics look for cousins. If we wish to know God we "feed" on His word. If we wish to remember His death we have communion and avail ourselves of the memory device that symbols bring. In Acts 2:42 the church continued in 1. Apostles Doctrine. 2. Fellowship, 3 Breaking of Bread and 4. Prayer. Catholics reverse the order and take a memorial and turn it into a pagan rite in which you basically are reduced to worshiping a wafer. At least that's what I deduce from hearing a priest advise someone to pray kneeling before the "blessed sacrament". If a cracker has that kind of power why don't you carry one in your pocket all the time?

August 13, 2014 at 1:49 pm PST
#2  Michael Rogala - Chicago, Illinois

This idea of "transubstantiation" has been debated for centuries. Volumes have been written pro and con. It's a big question . . . not only theological, but philosophical as well. And for the Roman Church philosophical underpinnings are very important. The issue of "transubstantion" depends on Aristotelian categories. If one doesn't subscribe to those categories . . . then it doesn't make sense.

However, I don't think the Real Presence is an issue of "sense". It is accepted on Faith. And that is not unusual for Catholics, Protestants, Jews, or Muslims, or any of the great faiths of the world. Some things are accepted on Faith . . .and to try and justify them by reason is futile.

For me the Real Presence, just "is". It makes a difference in my life . . . doesn't make me "sin-free", but it enriches my life and countless others in ways that are difficult to explain.

I might also say the same for the Word. Catholics ignored the saving Presence of God in the Bible for a long time. Vatican II brought about a change.

At Mass we hear the salvific Word of God . . . and then we see the action of God in the Eucharist that flows from the Word. Hope that helps a bit, Perry.

August 15, 2014 at 10:14 pm PST
#3  Perry White - Thomson, Georgia


True enough, it is a big question. I also agree that faith is the operative principle but it needs to be backed up by reason. God's reason. If the Bible says we are to trust that Christ has saved us upon our acknowledging Him then we accept it on faith. Same for many other issues. We run into difficulties when an organization or a person makes claims not backed up by Scripture and then says....trust me I am right.

The big issues where we disagree are the ones that are not biblically based. Viewing the issues through the philosophy of Aristotle to have it make sense can be addressed from the Bible. Colossians 2:8. The catholic church claims doctrines which it twists scripture to prove. The christian faith has doctrines which it gets from scripture and are worked out from there.
It really shouldn't be that hard for us to know what is truth. Start from the Word of God and work out. Therefore, if the wafer is the real presence then there should be some clear statement to that fact in scripture. If we wish to use reason, then we will not see Jesus extending a piece of bread and saying Take eat this is my body broken for you and think he means his actual body. He was right there. It makes perfect sense to say Take eat this represents my body. When forming doctrine it is necessary to have more than one verse pulled out of context to do so. There will be other verses that make it clear.
When you say the real presence "just is" you are relying on your feelings. What if my feelings say otherwise? Where do we go now? You can go to the magisterium if you wish but I am going to the Word of God. It is not found there. Nor is there an example of anyone ever doing it.
Try as they might, there is no clear proof for much of catholic doctrine, which is why even Tim Staples won't give me a verse to prove his position but says, go buy my book and we will talk. He needs to weave a philosophical web to prove his points.
Oh well..... Have a great day!

August 20, 2014 at 8:20 am PST

You are not logged in. Login or register to leave a comment.