Is Religion REALLY the Number One Cause of War?

July 29, 2013 | 3 comments

The assumption that religion is at the root of most of the major conflicts in human history seems to be ingrained in our society. But is this assumption correct? How can a Christian respond to it?

What are most wars fought over?

My friend and colleague Jimmy Akin explains this best:

Religion is a powerful motivator, and thus is often invoked in wartime, but the real reasons most wars have been fought have nothing to do with it. Instead, they have to do with political control—either allowing certain political leaders to gain or remain in power (e.g., who is the rightful heir to the throne) or they have to do with gaining political control of resources (e.g., land, money, food supplies, transportation and trade routes) or they have to do with a particular leader’s ambitions (i.e., being remembered as a great man, or not being remembered as a weak man). When leaders aren’t being totally naked about those things, they dress them up with national pride or religion, but ultimately they are not at the root.

Think of the modern wars you learned about in school. The American Revolution, World War I, World War II, Vietnam, Korea; none of these wars was fought for religious reasons. In fact, the bloodiest and most deadly wars of recent history were demonstrably motivated by something other than religion: out of whack nationalism (WWI), antireligious fascism (WWII), and atheistic Communism (Korea, Vietnam, the atrocities of Stalin and Mao).

Some commentators claim that religion as a reason for war has decreased due to the increasing secularization of Western society. This is also false. As Rabbi Alan Lurie explains:

The wars of the ancient world were rarely, if ever, based on religion. These wars were for territorial conquest, to control borders, secure trade routes, or respond to an internal challenge to political authority. In fact, the ancient conquerors, whether Egyptian, Babylonian, Persian, Greek, or Roman, openly welcomed the religious beliefs of those they conquered, and often added the new gods to their own pantheon.

Medieval and Renaissance wars were also typically about control and wealth as city-states vied for power, often with the support, but rarely instigation, of the Church. And the Mongol Asian rampage, which is thought to have killed nearly 30 million people, had no religious component whatsoever.

What about the charge of genocide?

Many of the skeptics I have encountered will respond to my argument by pointing to places like Rwanda, where Catholic clergy have been accused of fostering tribal tensions between the Tutsis and Hutus that led to the Rwandan Genocide. Like many other conflicts of this sort, however, the genocide in Rwanda was ethnically motivated. These tensions had existed for quite a long time, but they had little to do with religion.

The clergy members who did participate in the violence acted without the permission of the Church. It can also be pointed out that a number of the clergy gave their lives to protect the Tutsis. Either way, the Church did not sanction genocide.

If you are confronted with a particular conflict where religion is claimed to be the cause, do yourself a favor and research it. More often than not, you will find that something other than religion was behind it.


Jon Sorensen is the Director of External Activities for Catholic Answers. After earning his bachelor’s degree in 3D Animation and Visual Communications, he worked in the automotive industry producing television commercials, corporate videos, and print advertising campaigns. Jon has been with Catholic...

Catholic Controversies: Understanding Church Teachings And Events In History
Catholic Controversies: Understanding Church Teachings And Events In History gives Catholics and others seeking the truth a valuable resource for correcting the most common misunderstandings and myths perpetuated by the media, university professors and the uninformed. This valuable resource collects the very best articles addressing most of the “hot-button” issues used to undermine both the authority of the Church and the faith of Catholics, especially young people. Contributors include Peter Kreeft, Carl Olson, Thomas Madden, Father John Hardon, Avery Cardinal Dulles, Father Tad Pacholczyk, and so many more of today’s greatest Catholic thinkers. The topics range from proofs of God’s existence to the Spanish Inquisition to human cloning and stem-cell research.

Comments by Members

#1  D E Cantor - Los Angeles, California

I agree completely. It is a related issue that people often use religion to justify whatever bad things they want do do to other people, even when what they are doing unto others is against their stated religious beliefs.

August 24, 2013 at 6:50 pm PST
#2  Jim Willy - Chicago, Illinois

I'd like to point out that WW2 was a result of religious fascism, on hitlers side. Hitler was a catholic Christian, and actually believed he was doing the lords work by killing non Christian Jews, he clearly stated this on April 12, 1922. Also, Korea is a heavily religious country, in the sense that the leader is a god, still religious. What about the flood? God killed millions, for what reason? Because the he believed the people were corrupt and that that they were destroying his plan for a perfect planet, so he started fresh. Hitler gassed millions because they were screwing up his plan for a perfect Germany, creator or not, it's still not okay. Hitler and god are just as bad as each other in my eyes.

July 13, 2014 at 1:30 pm PST
#3  Chris Pluchar - Tinley Park, Illinois

Jim Willy,

First and foremost, I think we can agree that Hitler was a disturbed human being.

It's clear he didn't believe in or uphold the values of the Catholic faith. None of his actions were justified, sanctioned, or supported by the Catholic Church, whether he stated otherwise or not.

So how then can you condemn a religion and God as being as bad as Hitler?

You can't simply insist that the Catholic Church (or any faith or organization for that matter) is directly responsible for the actions of someone who identifies as part of their membership. That's both unfair and unjust.

Just like a parent, the Church does it's best to foster believers who follow the teachings, but also like a parent, sometimes that's not enough.

Hitler may have thrown religion into the mix as a layer of justification, but that wasn't his true motivation.

Take Care,

October 8, 2014 at 5:51 pm PST

You are not logged in. Login or register to leave a comment.