Will Our Next Pope Be the Last, Ushering in the End of the World?

February 15, 2013 | 2 comments

Pope Benedict’s renouncement of the papal office has spurred a rash of questions about the purported prophecies of St. Malachy. “Will Benedict’s successor be the last pope?” “Are we headed into a period of great tribulation?” “Will the world end soon?”

The last time we fielded so many such questions at Catholic Answers was about eight years ago, shortly after the death of Blessed John Paul II. This makes sense, because the prophecies in question concern the identities of popes from the twelfth century to the end of time. This time around it is a little different, though, because there is only one more pope identified after Benedict XVI: “Petrus Romanus” (Latin for “Peter the Roman”).

St. Malachy was an Irish bishop who lived in the twelfth century. He died in 1148, and his close friend St. Bernard of Clairvaux wrote his biography shortly afterward. St. Malachy was canonized in 1190 by Pope Clement III. Throughout this entire period there was never any mention of St. Malachy’s prophecies concerning the identities of future popes. In fact, not until the year 1590—400 years after St. Malachy’s canonization—did his prophecies surface.

Interestingly, 1590 was the same year Pope Sixtus V died and his successor was elected. At the time, every pope who had reigned during the prior 447 years had been correctly identified by St. Malachy. Sixtus V’s successor, Urban VII, ended that. There was another candidate for the papacy that year who did fit St. Malachy’s prophetic identification, but he was not elected. Since that time, interpreters have had to perform acrobatics with St. Malachy’s cryptic prophetic phrases in order to somehow vaguely relate them to the identities of the successive popes. In many cases it simply cannot be done. In other cases, doing so is a stretch at best.

For example, the Latin phrase identifying our current pope is Gloria olivioe (“Glory of olives”). To make this fit Pope Benedict, many interpreters follow a train of thought something like this: Joseph Ratzinger chose the name Benedict; St. Benedict founded the Benedictines; formally affiliated with the Benedictines since 1960 is the Order of Our Lady of Mt. Olivet (the Olivetans); thus Pope Benedict XVI is the “Glory of the olives.” It’s something akin to Kevin Bacon’s “six degrees of separation.”

Considering all these facts, most historians have concluded that the purported prophecies were a sixteenth-century forgery that failed to sway the electorate of 1590. Nevertheless, the prophecies were published in 1595, and they have continued to be an item of curiosity and speculation ever since, especially whenever a new pope is elected.

In regard to people who still choose to believe in the authenticity of the prophecies today, it is important to note that the prophecies do not actually predict the timing of tribulation or of the end of the world. The Catholic Encyclopedia, published more than 100 years ago, explains:

It has been noticed concerning Petrus Romanus, who according to St. Malachy's list is to be the last pope, that the prophecy does not say that no popes shall intervene between him and his predecessor designated Gloria olivioe. It merely says that he is to be the last, so that we may suppose as many popes as we please before "Peter the Roman."

St. Malachy, pray for us.

Jim Blackburn is a Catholic Apologist, Author, and Speaker. He holds a Masters Degree in Theology from John Paul the Great Catholic University and is the author of several books including 101 Quick Questions With Catholic Answers: Marriage, Divorce, and Annulment20 Answers: Scripture and...

Comments by Catholic.com Members

#1  jeffrey erwin - pewaukee, Wisconsin

Jim, thanks for your question. The comment that you quoted from the Catholic Enc. is taken from Fr. M.J. O'Brien's 1880 book which can be viewed online. Fr. O'Brien muddied the waters by combining paragraph 112 with 113 thereby shortening the prophecy by one. If you look at what Wion wrote on pg. 311 of the Lignum Vitae and compare it to what O'Brien transcribed, you can see the conflation.
What applies to Pope Francis is simply:
"In psecutione. extre-
S.R.E. sedebit."
"He will sit in the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church."
See the original page at Wikipedia.

The Petrus Romanus lines are a separate paragraph. Fr. O'Brien may have conflated the two paragraphs because they seem to flow together. But it seems clear from the original that 112 is separate from 113. (BTW, the Catholic Encyclopedia also says that the Holy Shroud of Turin is a fake, so I wouldn't put too much stock in it's accuracy.)

April 21, 2014 at 6:15 pm PST
#2  jeffrey erwin - pewaukee, Wisconsin

Dear Mr. Blackburn,
I disagree with your comment: "... it is important to note that the prophecies do not actually predict the timing of tribulation or of the end of the world." They most certainly do. What is "important to note" is that there are actually 113 prophecies, and Pope Francis is only number 112.
For #113 we have: "Peter the Roman, who will pasture his sheep in many tribulations: and when these things are finished the city of the seven hills will be destroyed, and the terrible Judge will judge his people. The end."
Jim, it's been two months. How about a reply?

July 1, 2014 at 6:34 pm PST

You are not logged in. Login or register to leave a comment.